What a tragety. what was he thinking?
I don't get that either.Why isn't he resting in a jail cell right now?
Total crock of B/S there.....
Why is it BS? There are so many possibilities that could explain what happened, including a blow out, tie rod failure, etc. Not all of which would be criminal.Why isn't he resting in a jail cell right now?
Total crock of B/S there.....
Why is it BS? There are so many possibilities that could explain what happened, including a blow out, tie rod failure, etc. Not all of which would be criminal.Why isn't he resting in a jail cell right now?
Total crock of B/S there.....
Not trying to start any type of flame war, but making rash decisions without ANY investigative information is, IMO, what is BS!
If the investigation proves he was texting his girlfriend, didn't like bikers, fell asleep, was drunk, or any number of other factors that would lead to culpability, that's when I would expect criminal charges, but not before then.
I think, because in a lot of traffic situations, you're guilty until proven innocent. Crossing the double yellow into a pack of police escorted bikes takes something special.Why is it BS? There are so many possibilities that could explain what happened, including a blow out, tie rod failure, etc. Not all of which would be criminal.Why isn't he resting in a jail cell right now?
Total crock of B/S there.....
Not trying to start any type of flame war, but making rash decisions without ANY investigative information is, IMO, what is BS!
If the investigation proves he was texting his girlfriend, didn't like bikers, fell asleep, was drunk, or any number of other factors that would lead to culpability, that's when I would expect criminal charges, but not before then.
Wow, it's sad indeed.Bryant Withers, 18, will not be charged because his conduct – although negligent – was not criminal, said F. Aaron Negangard. Prosecutor for Dearborn and Ohio counties.
“There’s nothing to suggest that it rose to criminal conduct. It was just an accident. He was not driving erratically, he was not intoxicated, he was not impaired,” Negangard said.
Well then, thats different. They deserved to die, as do all who fail to heed the ATGATT Creedo.It has been a long time since I posted up anything, but now is the time. The accident was and is a total drag. I see the comments on what should happen to the youngster at the wheel of the car. One thing I have not read was anyone making note that in the article about the crash that stated than none of the dead was wearing a helmet. The impact on the upper body could for sure do a person in with or without a helmet. My bet is that with the added protection of a helmet could have reduced the fatality count.
It has been a long time since I posted up anything, but now is the time. The accident was and is a total drag. I see the comments on what should happen to the youngster at the wheel of the car. One thing I have not read was anyone making note that in the article about the crash that stated than none of the dead was wearing a helmet. The impact on the upper body could for sure do a person in with or without a helmet. My bet is that with the added protection of a helmet could have reduced the fatality count.
That is a seriously gruesome link! Almost enough to make one think twice...nah, it couldn't happen to me... :dribble:Well then, thats different. They deserved to die, as do all who fail to heed the ATGATT Creedo.It has been a long time since I posted up anything, but now is the time. The accident was and is a total drag. I see the comments on what should happen to the youngster at the wheel of the car. One thing I have not read was anyone making note that in the article about the crash that stated than none of the dead was wearing a helmet. The impact on the upper body could for sure do a person in with or without a helmet. My bet is that with the added protection of a helmet could have reduced the fatality count.
Live to Ride-Ride to Die
If you are driving down the road, at or below the speed limit in a new town and somehow miss a stop sign, do you think you should go to jail?
But if you hit someone, and they die, now you should go to jail for the exact same violation?
If that's your thinking, then you are looking at an outcome based sense of justice, and that's not what our legal system is based on. It is primarily based on a culpable mental state, ie: intentionally, recklessly or negligently.
Now, add to it speeding, racing, drinking, or any other factors, and you have escalated the culpable mental state where a criminal charge could and should be applied.
However, having said all that, I do believe that crossing a double yellow is a serious violation. I'd like to know WHY he crossed the double yellow! We had a situation here recently where a woman crossing a double yellow to pass another vehicle hit a bicyclist (maybe it was 2 of them), and they died. In my opinion, she should have been charged with a crime because to me, passing on a double yellow is reckless driving.....yes, even for a bike!
Did you guys missed it in the story or my post? He was not paying attention and saw someone stopped on front of him and locked his brakes and car skid across the double yellow. At least that is what I read....At the end of the story it says that he locked up and car skid onto the oncoming riders. I can see him not paying attention to the road and watching the bikes and then suddenly boom. ...
Enter your email address to join: