colorocket
Active member
glad you weren't mangled. that's a good tip, so thanks for that. i usually stay off roads after a snow here, due to sand on the road. that too is bad news to avoid.
i didn't stay in a Holiday Inn Express but my suspicions are that I treat them like any other metal surface (large flat repair covers, bridges, etc.)... smooth, even, upright as she goes.Some manhole covers have a waffle pattern. Not sure it that would have helped me, but this one looks polished it's so smooth.
I'd agree. There's not much traction on any of 'em. Same goes for the vinyl road markings and most paints. If I encounter one in a corner that's tough to miss, I just straighten over it then continue the corner. But they can usually be missed.i didn't stay in a Holiday Inn Express but my suspicions are that I treat them like any other metal surface (large flat repair covers, bridges, etc.)... smooth, even, upright as she goes.Some manhole covers have a waffle pattern. Not sure it that would have helped me, but this one looks polished it's so smooth.
Good luck with that. I got an extensive e-mail from AMA this week about freedom and how the US was pushing for mandatory helmet laws nationally.We should probably get the AMA hot on trying to ban them.
I agree wholeheartedly. While I am a libertarian at heart, and deep down I do believe that everyone should have the right to off themselves in whatever way they choose to, I am not a fan of the AMA using membership fees to fight the institution of new helmet laws. There are plenty of other groups of wahoos to do that.From the original attempt (back in 1999) to help AMA escalate this KNOWN SAFETY HAZARD, those efforts went ignored. To this e-mail, I simply added that it was clear that the issue they were championing drew more donations from the pirate hoard than real issues of safety.
At one point, roughly half its membership favored mandatory helmet laws and roughly half opposed. If that's still true, it seems anything they do will be in opposition to half the membership. I'd think their best stance would be to urge the membership to write their congressman with their personal views on the subject and move on.I agree wholeheartedly. While I am a libertarian at heart, and deep down I do believe that everyone should have the right to off themselves in whatever way they choose to, I am not a fan of the AMA using membership fees to fight the institution of new helmet laws. There are plenty of other groups of wahoos to do that.
I would much prefer that they took on real safety issues like tar snakes, manhole covers, slick road markings, etc. Things that effect the safety of all motorcyclists. Perhaps if we had a number of folks write to Dingman expressing that kind of sentiment we could get some, erm.. traction on the issue? (sorry, bad play on words)
Yeah, and the stuff piles up in corners, turn lanes, etc. and lingers halfway well into summer. Forgot about that.glad you weren't mangled. that's a good tip, so thanks for that. i usually stay off roads after a snow here, due to sand on the road. that too is bad news to avoid.
This is timely as over the last couple of months, I've been waiting to see if the AMA would address an issue I thought deserved addressing - but so far squat. Was going to mention this after Bounce's post but didn't want to hijack the thread too much. But maybe if this is split off, and maybe if some issues are reasonably and intelligently articulated here, and maybe once accumulated it somehow gets presented to the hierarchy of the the AMA (would we happen to know anyone on the inside?), might it maybe illicit a response from them on some of our concerns?At one point, roughly half its membership favored mandatory helmet laws and roughly half opposed. If that's still true, it seems anything they do will be in opposition to half the membership. I'd think their best stance would be to urge the membership to write their congressman with their personal views on the subject and move on.I agree wholeheartedly. While I am a libertarian at heart, and deep down I do believe that everyone should have the right to off themselves in whatever way they choose to, I am not a fan of the AMA using membership fees to fight the institution of new helmet laws. There are plenty of other groups of wahoos to do that.
I would much prefer that they took on real safety issues like tar snakes, manhole covers, slick road markings, etc. Things that effect the safety of all motorcyclists. Perhaps if we had a number of folks write to Dingman expressing that kind of sentiment we could get some, erm.. traction on the issue? (sorry, bad play on words)
Suppose someone agrees with you completely... and then next week that same someone decides to tell you that "ATGATT" is considered at least 4 tires, seatbelts, and airbags all around?I don't like the fact that they're spending political capital in lobbying against helmet laws. Were I king of the forest (and there are huge reasons why I'm not), I'd lobby for ATGATT laws. But that's just me
If a person is old enough to make the decision to get on a motorcycle or drive a car and make 100+ decisions a mile that could injure or kill someone, that person is smart enough to figure out if they want to don a helmet, pants, gloves, condom, whatever...If someone wants to hit their head and die, I don't care. It's their life and they can live it or not.Suppose someone agrees with you completely... and then next week that same someone decides to tell you that "ATGATT" is considered at least 4 tires, seatbelts, and airbags all around?I don't like the fact that they're spending political capital in lobbying against helmet laws. Were I king of the forest (and there are huge reasons why I'm not), I'd lobby for ATGATT laws. But that's just me
But, if they botch the job and only have major brain trauma, the life time of care has to be paid by someone. If I accidentally cause a minor motorcycle accident that a reasonably equipped rider would walk away from but the rider did nothing to protect themselves they have changed me from causing an unfortunate fender bender to someone that took a life. How should I feel about that?...If someone wants to hit their head and die, I don't care. It's their life and they can live it or not.
Riding a motorcycle is inherently dangerous (with or without a helmet). Should the safety nannies also prohibit the riding of motorcycles?But, if they botch the job and only have major brain trauma, the life time of care has to be paid by someone....If someone wants to hit their head and die, I don't care. It's their life and they can live it or not.
Forcing people to do things is not the right way... Education... is the right way... Show a kid learning to ride, a couple pictures of nursing home veggies... or crushed skulls from 5mph accidents... make him or her WANT to wear one.. all set..... but ... tell them they HAVE TO.. and most will fight you tooh and nail.
You will still have some idiots...but then we are on to talking Darwin stuff...
Enter your email address to join: