timk
timk
Haven't taken a look as yet. Has anyone checked if there's room for a couple of grease zerks?
Wow, I first thought only 10,500 miles on the bike and the dog bones broke?! :blink:The 2006 FJR has 170,000 km (10,500 miles) on it.
But... 170,000 km is ~105,000 miles. Er... muz a bin a typo.
Scoot
No need to wonder, item #18 in the periodic maintenance chart in the owner's manual for my 2007 FJR1300A:I agree with everyone here that lubrication of these parts is critical and I doubt it is being done in very many shops and I am not sure if it is even specified in the service or shop manual (I will look this weekend)
Correct Ig is, both counts. The root cause appears to be the bearing. Looking at the pix, those DBs have had issues for some time, it doesn't look like the bearing got tight and it just snapped on the spot. The corrosion looks deep and the tear of the metal looks like there was only half the meat left anyway. Hearing snap crackle and pop should be a huge warning.Just to be clear since it's a compound sentence, I'm NOT suggesting to inspect dog bones. I'm saying to inspect the bearing that is the underlying issue. Inspecting a dog bone is like checking to see if the *** of the FJR fell down...it doesn't address the real issue at all. The only reason I'd check the dog bones is if I found the bearing failed or not turning smoothly and quietly. And as another person mentioned you probably can't tell whether they have hairline cracks or not without special equipment...and if a crack were to be visible...I bet it will fail before you see it.ood tip from Ig to keep in mind that this is a RARE occurrence (even more rare than CCT issues) and you may want to start inspection the DBs periodically.
My bearing seems to be move freely and quietly. I'll have to decide whether to actually take it off or not.
And I'd classify the CCT issue is uncommon, but certainly not rare.
On Kawasaki's like the (old now) ZG 1000 Conours, the dog bone bearings and the rear pivot bearings had zerks! Howza come they are missin' on the Yamaha?Just to be clear since it's a compound sentence, I'm NOT suggesting to inspect dog bones. I'm saying to inspect the bearing that is the underlying issue.
My bearing seems to be move freely and quietly. I'll have to decide whether to actually take it off or not.
The needle bearing assemblies used on both the FJR and the C-10 need very little lube (grease) -- but, they need some. They also need to be sealed from contaminant (water/grit) ingress.On Kawasaki's like the (old now) ZG 1000 Conours, the dog bone bearings and the rear pivot bearings had zerks! Howza come they are missin' on the Yamaha?Just to be clear since it's a compound sentence, I'm NOT suggesting to inspect dog bones. I'm saying to inspect the bearing that is the underlying issue.
My bearing seems to be move freely and quietly. I'll have to decide whether to actually take it off or not.
Prolly sealed?
I used to lube those zerks religiously on my Connie, but no can do on the Yammy?
Good point.The rollers have a unique "dry lube" cage that resembles old grease-do not get carried away in there, it falls apart easily and you're screwed. I replaced the bearings on frank cuz I thought the grease had dried up, and cleaning things caused their destruction
Says the Automotive Master Mechanic and motorcycle restorer extraordinaire......wasn't a tough job at all if you have access to a large vise and patience.
In Long, I am continually amazed how nice people can buy motorcycles, pay significant amounts for service that never gets done and then ride around blissfully unaware of the risks thay have been exposed to by shoddy workmanship.In short, I am continually amazed how people can treat a high performance precision machine like a ******* Maytag.
Nothing but FJRs and FJs....I'm glad this is getting a bit of publicity your side because I get my FJR serviced at the club workshop in the UK who do nothing but FJRs and they reckon about 1 in 10
Love yah Dave...What it all boils down to, IMHO, is that this bike is not a 73 Impala. You can't just ride forever and expect the machine to perform, or even function, like it did when you rode it out of the showroom. Every moving part needs attention eventually, often the degradation in performance is so subtle you don't notice it until it's too late-or you ride one that has been carefully tended to, and the difference is obvious. I thoroughly enjoy the hands on approach-and that has rewarded me with never a component failure EVER, in 40 years, on a variety of machines. Again, I am a motorhead-I get off on lubing and tuning ****, but the way I see it is-if you can't do it yourself, and are unable or unwilling to pay someone else to do it for you, find another hobby. This isn't to say you may get waylaid-like D said, sometimes the strange stuff may getcha-but an inspection done solely because it's a component that moves would have caught it sooner. I try to anticipate the need, and as a result have never been caught. Too anal? Fine, I confess. But it's not like I have a whole lot of other stuff on the burner, and going WFO on any ride I've had, on a whim, secure in the knowledge that it will take whatever I can dish out and then some at any time is a reward in itself, and has won me many a contest I might not have otherwise dominated. Think about it.
Enter your email address to join: