this is where i think we disagree. i'll have to agree with the writer who compared 2 schools of throught.3. At this point, I think I accept crashing as a risk of my riding style, so the question becomes, are you willing to risk your arse for a hobby you love?
the first was the group that looked at all trips as a sum-total risk and that the more you rode, the more likely you were to wreck. sort of like drawing a limited number of lots from a hat that decreased after each drawing; eventually your number will be up and that's when you crash. it's that whole "those who have and those who will crash" mindset.
the second was that each ride was it's own "universe" the probability variable get reset each time. if there's a 5% chance that all riders wreck then it's 5% each time (not 5% then 8% then 12% and so on as you ride again and again). your skill, your attitude, your respect for prevailing conditions and everything else come into play with each ride.
in the statement above, i would surmise that simply resigning yourself to such a mindset would increase your odds of wrecking for no other reason that the fatalism it embraces. sort of a "well hell, we all gotta go sometime" approach that thinks nothing of letting a little sloppy thinking in (toward any number of things that could affect the outcome of a ride - safety, awareness, outriding your sight line, etc.). eh, so what? i'm bound to wreck eventually, what's another 2, or 3 or 4 tenths on public roads?
really? double yellow through a corner?I passed on a double yellow line.
I do beleive ... I could have made that turn.
EEK!