FJRSTAR
Fuggin' Just Ride the best sport-tourer on the
Carry on...
Last edited by a moderator:
That Rocket III puts some serious torque on the pavement and does so on the straights and in the turns/twisties. Pretty impressive.Emphasis added. I agree with what you are saying. If you read the first page or so, you'll see that I don't ride like that. I don't think a CT is for everyone, (said many times now), but the purpose of this experiment is to see how well, or how badly, it works on the FJR.If you are riding fast the throttle is coming on when you are at full lean (with trail braking). On an FJR you are putting a lot of horsepower to the ground at a pretty steep lean angle. I still suspect that this combo will reduce the handling performance of OUR bike when ridden aggressively, and so for me it's out no matter how much money it saves. <snip>
It's just about options. Some FJR riders put pure sport tires on and are very happy with the results. Some don't need that level of traction or want/need longer tire life. For many, normal ST tires are a perfect compromise. For some, it's still not enough life and we look for other options.
The thing the vid does show is that he keeps up with his fellow riders just fine. That doesn't necessarily mean that's your pace, or mine, or fossilriders. Looks bad ass on the Rocket III though.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Not even. I'm just some guy crazy enough to try something that looks wrong, but no one has actually tried on the FJR yet. At least in our little community.Don't you mean Tesla...maybe?I think this is a great idea. good for you. For those of you that claim I am just a naysayer and OCFjr is the next coming of Thomas Edison
Keep doing your research. I am very curious about this.:lol: :lol: :lol: Not even. I'm just some guy crazy enough to try something that looks wrong, but no one has actually tried on the FJR yet. At least in our little community.Don't you mean Tesla...maybe?I think this is a great idea. good for you. For those of you that claim I am just a naysayer and OCFjr is the next coming of Thomas Edison
welcome to the internetEnough already boys. Some of the non-topic crap on this thread almost has me ready to unsub from the topic.
Take it to PM and leave the thread for constructive comments/questions please. That doesn't mean just ones in favor either. I appreciate opinions if they have some foundation of actual experience or data.
Thanks.
Not the best cornering line but who am I to I am I to criticize, I am the master of the multiple apex. Keep up with the CT testing. Ian, IowaCommon among the Goldwing riders. Here's a link to one who rides the dragon!
Tom Franken
and another pic.
Yo Eric, you rode the little school bus as a kid didn't ya? C'mon, admit it!
Woops, out of popcorn, gotta go get some more.
Still, the area that rubs is only the arm to the brake caliper. I fabbed a steel replacement for the moment so I can ride some miles on it, but will fabricate a solid aluminum bar that mimics the stock piece, but with a dish where the interference is. It won't take much, but I don't want to machine the tubular stock piece. I think it would weaken it more than I like. It's really only there to prevent rotation if you forget to tighten the axle. ;-)
Oh yeah - if you ever DO crash, good luck getting the insurance to cover it.
Seating the bead is not an issue with the car tire. There is so much pressure on the beads w/o air, and the CT beads sit deeper on the rim than moto tires. The beads are there. The wider tire creates difficulty in getting the second side to sit down under the rim. That's where all the extra effort is. It wants to slip off the rim as you work it around. Moto tires are narrower and easier to manuver so that the first bead stays in the valley of the wheel while you push the second bead onto the wheel.Any trouble seating the bead that's pretty amazing that it took 2 men with tire irons AND a machine to mount that sucker!
Enter your email address to join: