MrZappo
Can we please go riding now ?
The difference is that FJR type people (who also tend to be tenere or vstrom people as well and a few other things), generally gravitate to things that "work well" that are suited to the task at hand.
We buy the stuff that "works" or has some "utility" . So, in looking for the best items for the job, we find things like aerostitch or klim or sidi or whatever and we buy it because it is PROTECTIVE. And we need something protective.
Speaking strictly for myself, I certainly would not buy something that was crap because the collective does. It just so happens that that sport touring and adventure riding collective all reach the same conclusions and "end up" with some of the same products.
A friend of mine road a sprint 955 for 10 years and had good gear and a good Nolan full face helmet. He got in an accident and smashed his head on the windshield of a car. He emerged unscathed due to his helmet primarily.
The next week he took the settlement money and bought a big ol' HOG much to my surprise.
Part of the insurance settlement included a new Shoei RF 1200. He wore it once.
The next week he shows up with a HD cap style helmet. He tells me that he just didn't look right with the full face on the new bike.
So, now he rides around with a helmet that will result in death if he gets into another accident that provided the insurance money to buy the HD.
So, the "look" thing is important in that group. I couldn't give a squirt about it personally and it really makes no sense. But, hey, it's his noggin.
All this to say that I buy for utility first and if it happens to be so the same thing as any of you, it is because great minds think alike. NOT because I'm following the crowd.
The HD crowd buys to impress and generally doesn't give a second thought to anyghing else.
IMHO
We buy the stuff that "works" or has some "utility" . So, in looking for the best items for the job, we find things like aerostitch or klim or sidi or whatever and we buy it because it is PROTECTIVE. And we need something protective.
Speaking strictly for myself, I certainly would not buy something that was crap because the collective does. It just so happens that that sport touring and adventure riding collective all reach the same conclusions and "end up" with some of the same products.
A friend of mine road a sprint 955 for 10 years and had good gear and a good Nolan full face helmet. He got in an accident and smashed his head on the windshield of a car. He emerged unscathed due to his helmet primarily.
The next week he took the settlement money and bought a big ol' HOG much to my surprise.
Part of the insurance settlement included a new Shoei RF 1200. He wore it once.
The next week he shows up with a HD cap style helmet. He tells me that he just didn't look right with the full face on the new bike.
So, now he rides around with a helmet that will result in death if he gets into another accident that provided the insurance money to buy the HD.
So, the "look" thing is important in that group. I couldn't give a squirt about it personally and it really makes no sense. But, hey, it's his noggin.
All this to say that I buy for utility first and if it happens to be so the same thing as any of you, it is because great minds think alike. NOT because I'm following the crowd.
The HD crowd buys to impress and generally doesn't give a second thought to anyghing else.
IMHO