That was my conclusion.
1. How much would I make at x/100% of full retirement over the years I would collect that?
2. How much more would I make @ 100%?
3. How many years would I need to be retired at 100% for that difference to equal the amount collected @ x/100%?
The answer, for me, was 27 years. That's 27 years after the older retirement age not the earlier age. While optimistically, I hope to live to 95 - 100 year old, it really is an odds game. They are betting you don't and tempting you to stay longer, so they pay you less over all.
1. How much would I make at x/100% of full retirement over the years I would collect that?
2. How much more would I make @ 100%?
3. How many years would I need to be retired at 100% for that difference to equal the amount collected @ x/100%?
The answer, for me, was 27 years. That's 27 years after the older retirement age not the earlier age. While optimistically, I hope to live to 95 - 100 year old, it really is an odds game. They are betting you don't and tempting you to stay longer, so they pay you less over all.
Last edited by a moderator: