Silverbullet
Well-known member
Three years ago and 8 days before we were leaving for our annual 2 weeks bike trip, I managed to break two bones in my left hand. I remember thinking how much all this sucks while sitting at the hospital looking at my x-ray and having it explained to me I wasn't going to be riding my motorcycle anywhere, anytime soon. The specialist was brought in and he further explained to me the potential hazzards of not letting him make the (according to him) necessary repairs surgically. Certainly to listen to him tell it, I would deeply regret not becoming his "customer."
The next day I went and saw my regular M.D. His opinion was quite different in regards to my long term outcome without surgery but he still wanted to cast it up to keep it stable and protect the hand from further injury. I told him that all sounded just dandy but I still couldn't ride my bike in a cast and I was going on my bike trip, on schedule, so what were my options beyond the cast? I left his office with a brace to stabilize the hand, which I wore for a day or two and that was enough of that for me. I took the bike trip as planned and considered riding the bike as my "physical therapy" using the same care and caution with my hand as I had done with a broken leg many years before. Today my hand is fine and although I can't predict what the future may bring in regards to arthritis, I'm not convinced that wasn't still a potential future issue even with the surgery.
A decision like this is a personal one however and anyone elses experience is probably only usefull for reference as YOU will be the one living with the results. I would think a break at the joint is a more complex issue than a break in the middle of a bone and making a decision as to the best way to treat the injury isn't made any easier when you are trying to figure out if the Doctor is recommending a surgical repair because it offers the best potential outcome or it's a form of CYA in our malpractice lawsuit happy society or even a bit of both. I've found since it's my body, I have the most at stake and will ultimately have to live with the outcome, it has been worth the time to educate myself as much as possible before letting anyone go "tinkering under the hood" so to speak. YMMV.
The next day I went and saw my regular M.D. His opinion was quite different in regards to my long term outcome without surgery but he still wanted to cast it up to keep it stable and protect the hand from further injury. I told him that all sounded just dandy but I still couldn't ride my bike in a cast and I was going on my bike trip, on schedule, so what were my options beyond the cast? I left his office with a brace to stabilize the hand, which I wore for a day or two and that was enough of that for me. I took the bike trip as planned and considered riding the bike as my "physical therapy" using the same care and caution with my hand as I had done with a broken leg many years before. Today my hand is fine and although I can't predict what the future may bring in regards to arthritis, I'm not convinced that wasn't still a potential future issue even with the surgery.
A decision like this is a personal one however and anyone elses experience is probably only usefull for reference as YOU will be the one living with the results. I would think a break at the joint is a more complex issue than a break in the middle of a bone and making a decision as to the best way to treat the injury isn't made any easier when you are trying to figure out if the Doctor is recommending a surgical repair because it offers the best potential outcome or it's a form of CYA in our malpractice lawsuit happy society or even a bit of both. I've found since it's my body, I have the most at stake and will ultimately have to live with the outcome, it has been worth the time to educate myself as much as possible before letting anyone go "tinkering under the hood" so to speak. YMMV.
Last edited by a moderator: