Canadian FJR
Canadian FJR
This video does a good job of explaining the differences and also helps me understand the front end feel I get in the twisties with the PR IIIs.
Canadian FJR
Completely agree, and we were at the same mileage. On my tires the front sides were gone and the rear center was so thin you could just about put your thumb through it. Even Ray didn't want them as take-offs, and he will run anything with a few miles left on it. When I left home I had decent tread, and that just evaporated in about 1K miles. The pr2 replacements I got in Bend are going to need changed out this spring, but again I got pretty good miles out of them, and a change is driven by wear on the rear tire, fronts are fine.Mine handled very well. They felt awesome and stuck as well as anything I have ever tried. This may freak some out, but they stuck and handled very similarly to my Roadsmarts that I loved. They also lasted almost exactly the same mileage but cost $20 more per set.
Honestly I could have gotten maybe another 500 miles out of them, but I was over 1k from home when they literally disappeared in one day. I left my house with 5k on them, fully expecting 10k by the way they looked and measured. At 7500, they were on the floor of Ray's shop.
I would have felt like a lone idiot, but two of us that were running PR3s left home with the same expectation and had to ride to Bend OR to buy replacements. TominCA's PR3s evaporated also.
They were nice tires, but for the same mileage and feel, I'll run the Roadsmarts...After I finish these current Angels. I really like them but I'm betting I see cords before 7k and they're not cheap.
A couple of things.
First to Tom In Ca and HRZ.
I am wondering if your tires really did disappear in the last 1K miles or if it was an optical illusion that I similarly experienced. When I left Denver heading for the West coast a couple of years back, I figured I had enough rubber to make it home. At the first gas stop I checked the rear tire and was surprised how much it "appeared" to have worn. Checked at the next gas stop and couldn't believe my eyes. The damn thing was wearing at an alarming rate. Well, at this point I'm nowhere near a tire dealer no matter which direction I go, so I muster on. I get to the next gas stop and am oddly relieved. The wear seems to have abated. This goes on until I get home. Hardly any more apparent wear.
The illusion? The first couple of gas stops, the sipes near the center were rapidly receding toward the edges, giving the appearance of advanced wear. Once the sipes reached the point where they were no longer contacting the pavement, the "apparent" i.e. visible wear ceased. BTW, these were PR2's. YMMV
Second point goes to those of you who experience nirvana when new rubber is installed. Try a set of BT-023's. These have felt better and better from day one to the wear bars and beyond. I used to experience the same new tire nirvana with Michelins, but with the 023's it was nirvana all the way through. Again YMMV
Mark
My experience exactly Mark. Every set of 023GTs I've run has provided very stable performance from beginning to end. None of the dreaded (here comes the truck) steering as Michelins do halfway through their life.<snip> Second point goes to those of you who experience nirvana when new rubber is installed. Try a set of BT-023's. These have felt better and better from day one to the wear bars and beyond. I used to experience the same new tire nirvana with Michelins, but with the 023's it was nirvana all the way through. Again YMMV
Mark
Not to be condescending, but that's what "dual-compound" means in a tire description. Harder rubber in the center, softer rubber towards the edges. Not unusual for tires marketed to touring riders.Kneedragger55 posted: You'd think for GT bikes they'd make the middle sections super hard, and sides super soft, I mean who needs sticky middles anyway?
Enter your email address to join: