No flames, just a difference in philosophy.
I set mine to the 70th percentile as a means to extend the time between required re-shims, which that will accomplish. Technically you are correct that setting the clearance to the minimum clearance will allow the largest valve rise, however the difference we are talking about here is only .05mm of lift (difference between .15mm min spec and my .20mm "70% target")
The total valve lift is defined by the cam grind. The cam lobes are 8.053mm tall. (Interestingly, both intake and exhaust lobes have the same dimensions). Subtracting the clearances from the lobe dimension means that the total valve lift will be 7.903mm @ .15 clearance vs 7.853mm @ .20 clearance or a difference of 0.6% less lift at the larger clearance.
The valve lift does not directly translate into improved intake flow because it is not the only limiting factor to the flow. The difference in engine performance will be (is) negligible.
I set mine to the 70th percentile as a means to extend the time between required re-shims, which that will accomplish. Technically you are correct that setting the clearance to the minimum clearance will allow the largest valve rise, however the difference we are talking about here is only .05mm of lift (difference between .15mm min spec and my .20mm "70% target")
The total valve lift is defined by the cam grind. The cam lobes are 8.053mm tall. (Interestingly, both intake and exhaust lobes have the same dimensions). Subtracting the clearances from the lobe dimension means that the total valve lift will be 7.903mm @ .15 clearance vs 7.853mm @ .20 clearance or a difference of 0.6% less lift at the larger clearance.
The valve lift does not directly translate into improved intake flow because it is not the only limiting factor to the flow. The difference in engine performance will be (is) negligible.
Last edited by a moderator: