wfooshee
O, Woe is me!!
The fundamental and deadly flaw in that is the assumption that your opponent is unarmed and will suddenly become submissive, and that nobody around the incident is going to interpret your action as an immediate and deadly threat and take what they see as appropriate action against you.The best way I've seen it put is that you don't shoot to kill, you don't shoot to maim, you just want the aggressor to stop the aggression and that just may only need a round chambered and pointed his way.
The only reason a civilian should draw a weapon is for its immediate use. If someone is committing an act which is an immediate threat to life or limb, you drop them. No warning, no "Stop or I'll shoot," you drop them to save the other life. You shoot to kill. That's how it's taught in the concealed carry permit class.
The guy chasing me in road rage or whatever his problem was seemed like a possible threat to my life, but as soon as I parked in front of the restaurant and he parked, too, that threat was removed. Had I been armed I had no legal reason to brandish a weapon.
Last edited by a moderator: