Remaining Oil Life Indicators

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
When I got my Accord, the first thing I did was reach for the owner's manual to check the intervals. Guess what? There ain't none. Merely, it says when you see the little wrench light up, bring it in for service. OK, no problem. Seems I'm going about 7,500 miles between, um, wrenches.

 
One additional tidbit, on GM's oil change intervals; even if the oil life percentage is a positive number, the oil should be changed if it has been in the vehicle for one year. At least that's what is stated in my '04 Bravada service manual (I'm assuming this recommendation hasn't changed).

 
Hey Jestal,

Kinda bout oil here,

How in the heck does Amsoil have a 25,000 mile oil interval change recommendation if you use their filter(no filter spin offs in-between)for auto's. They claim any engine oil related failure is covered under their warranty so long as you have a Amsoil servicer doing your oil changes and use their filter??? If their oil needs changing as much as conventional, I would assume they will be broke or getting sued often in the near future..

Whats your comments?

WW

 
...The reflection part of it reminded me that GM has patented many of the techniques and algorithms used in modeling the oil life. Yes, you can patent engine control software. So, technically I would think that other companies are not using the same algorithms that GM uses so naturely they cannot be as accurate or as good....... :D :D :D I still suspect that they work OK, though.
Hey Jestal. You know all that only holds true UNTIL the Chinese reverse engineer the thing. Then, everybody has it!

:)

 
One additional tidbit, on GM's oil change intervals; even if the oil life percentage is a positive number, the oil should be changed if it has been in the vehicle for one year. At least that's what is stated in my '04 Bravada service manual (I'm assuming this recommendation hasn't changed).


That is true. The "or one year" service limit is still good.

 
My understanding is that most of the maintenance minder systems are strictly based on an algorithms using the sensors already in place for engine control: total revs, max revs, temps, cold starts, etc.

A few systems (MB is one that I know about) have sensors in the oil that measure electrical properties of the oil and add this to the algoirthm. I believe they work on on measuring capacitance of the oil whichi s related to oil breakdown, but I don't know for sure.

- Mark

 
Hey Jestal,
Kinda bout oil here,

How in the heck does Amsoil have a 25,000 mile oil interval change recommendation if you use their filter(no filter spin offs in-between)for auto's. They claim any engine oil related failure is covered under their warranty so long as you have a Amsoil servicer doing your oil changes and use their filter??? If their oil needs changing as much as conventional, I would assume they will be broke or getting sued often in the near future..

Whats your comments?

WW


The next few paragraphs were shamelessly cut and pasted from the other oil thread that is active....... :)

Amsoil has a good product. ...Just that it isn't any better than a lot of the other stuff out there and they charge and arm and a leg for it with their tiered marketing scheme. Most of the Amsoil zealots tend to be dealers....somehow......

Matching it to what manufacturer's specs..??? I don't think any manufacturer recommends Amsoil. I know that they won't even submit their product to GM for confirmation as an oil for the Corvette or Cadillac engines that spec synthetic. Wonder why..???

Amsoil is on the outs with most manufacturers with their insistence of claiming 25,000 mile oil change intervals with their product. There is no question that under certain rare circumstances their oil will go 25,000 miles between changes. But, under those same rare circumstances, most other modern oils will also. Amsoil bases their 25,000 mile oil change claims on their test results from the Sequence 3E tests that only measures oxidation rates. If oxidation were to be the sole determining factor they might have a point. It isn't and they don't. But Amsoil still continues their claims in their marketing. When you read their fine print these days they say to "follow oil life monitor if the vehicle is so equipped" and such but they do not take the 25,000 mile BS off their banner ads. No manufacturer agrees with this as it is very misleading and wrong.

Amsoil isn't going to ruin an engine if you change the oil properly but you can get the same level of protection (or even better) for much less money with a number of other products.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In short, their 25,000 mile claim is purely a marketing ploy in my opinion. I think that most people will never run the oil that long but they like the feeling that they could if they wanted to. Plus, they feel that Amsoil must have a better product if they can make that claim. Nonsense. Pure PT Barnumism.

Once again, there are MANY resasons for changing the oil. Oxidation (what Amsoil basis their claim on) is only one reason and RARELY THE reason that you need to change oil. Amsoil offers absolutely nothing that makes up for contamination by water and gasoline and other combustion byproducts. And their ZDP levels, while higher in some cases than other oils, are still not high enough to match the depletion rate over 25,000 miles in all cases in all engines.

Having said all that you must realize that the oil life monitors and oil life algorithms have quite a bit of safety factor built into them. Honestly, if the oil life monitor is saying change the oil at 12,500 miles the oil is still "good" and could still be pressed into service for many thousands of miles more. That is the case with any oil if you are operating under the conditions that would allow a change at 12,500.

The debate probably comes in when you try to decide when the oil is actually no longer serviceable. Someone has to look at the oxidation rate, acid formation, contamination levels, etc. and put a line in the sand as to when to recommend a change. I think the rest of the industry (petroleum and automotive) are much more conservative than Amsoil. Amsoil apparently allows the oil to be nearly 100% unserviceable with their 25,000 mile change interval. Since there is nothing in their product that other oils don't have then they must be looking at the data differently than everyone else. That is why no manufacturer recommends them.

The get away with it for the reasons stated above. Most people really don't do 25,000 mile oil changes. If they do, they would install the Amsoil after the engine is already broken in with miles on it so the lubrication degradation is going to be slower with an already broken in engine. They don't realize that they have less "insurance" or robustness in the lubricant for the last half of it's life. If the engine and conditins are perfect then all goes well.....which is the usual case. Even if the oil causes some wear it is likely to go undetected unless the engine is torn down. You probably notice that there are really few to none "lubrication related" engine failures anymore. The engines are much more robust to poor oil quality.

When the oil life monitors are calibrated we always want the oil to be changed while there is sufficient anti-wear and anti-oxidation resistance left in the oil to still handle an abnormal condition. We simply do not run the oil to the absolute limits that Amsoil appears to recommend. If you are comfortable with what Amsoil recommends then use 25,000 mile oil changes. Just realize that you could just as easily get away with it with any oil, not just Amsoil and/or if you run 25,000 mile oil changes with Amsoil and get away with it you could have with most any oil.

Some other products have "extended service" limits also. Namely some of the Mobil 1 products. Those oils have additional ZDP concentration specifically to improve the ZDP level as it depletes over extended change interval miles. Notice that those oils do NOT have the ILSAC starburst symbol that identify the oil as "For gasoline engines" ?? That is because the oils have ZDP concentrations that exceed the level required by ILSAC "For gasoline engine" approval and those oils are not as fuel efficient as the ILSAC approved oils due to the reduced level of friction modifiers. So....in your modern gasoline engine that is spec'ed for ILSAC "For Gasoline Engines" oil those extended service oils are not the correct oils. They will work fine and actually give better protection but they are technically NOT the correct oil for your engine. EVen with those oils Mobil still recommends following the oil life monitor.

The key thing in any of these oil debates and marketing claims is to realize that not all engines are the same. What will work for one type of engine might not work for another and what works for one type of service might not work for another. Just becuase one engine of a particular type ran 25,000 miles without a change does not mean that 1000 engines of the same type would ALWAYS do that. If you have the unlucky one out of a thousand then you would be pissed. You have to understand what each engine requires and what the different types of oils are designed for. And, you must realize that if it seems too good to be true, it probably is.

 
Jestal has written a lot of good information but I want to make sure I got this right.

In general, an oil life monitor measures time, oil temp, and oil pressure, and uses that information to determine the rate of oil degradation/oxidation? When the manufacturer determined threshold is reached, an indicator illuminates.

Now, If the previous statement is correct, then I have some questions that I hope Jestal can clarify, or anyone else for that matter. As an engine ages will the oil change indicator become less accurate since one of the traits of an aging engine is slightly reduced oil pressure? Will the use of different oil (something other than what the manufacturer recommends) also change the effectiveness of the indicator?

It all sounds pretty cool but I am still suspicious. I wish you could buy an affordable tester where you put a couple drops of oil in a devise that would compute oxidation, viscosity, and contamination level. I would absolutely buy one of them.

 
I'll have to re-read my posts but I don't think oil pressure was mentioned. In any case oil pressure is not part of the engine oil life monitor calculation.

Fundamentally the oil life monitor I am familiar with counts engine revolutions and keeps a cumulative record of engin revolutions since the oil was changed and the oil life monitor reset. That serves as the basis for the oil life remaining. Various deterioration factors modify the slope of the oil life degradation curve based on coolant temp, oil temperature, soak times, run times, engine load, etc... All this information is available from existing sensors and is "in" the ECM already.

Since many (most) engines do not have an oil temp sensor the oil temp is modeled based on engine RPM, load and time at any given operating condition. Modeling oil temp is not that hard and can be done very accurately it turns out.

There was a tremendous amount of research into what variable would track oil life....engine revolutions is that parameter. Each time the engine rotates the ZDP in the oil is "used up" a tiny bit. The sacrifical nature of ZDP and the rate it is depleted closes follows the number of engine revolutions once you understand/identify the correction factor experimentally. This was based on thousands and thousands of oil samples being analyzed so as to achieve good correlation between the actual oil life remaining and the cumulative engine revolutions to that point. The other parameters end up being multipliers of the gradual degredation modeled by the cummulative engine revolutions.

Funny how people trust the manufacturer to do the development and validation of all the other systems in the car but are totally suspect of the manufacturer's ability to develop and calibrate and validate the oil life monitor.

Engine oil is one of the few things that people can control with their cars these days so taking care of the oil is almost a religious experience. There is way way too much angst over engine oil. Really.

As stated, the oil life monitor calibration assumes you will be using the recommended oil. An ILSAC rated "for Gasoline Engines" oil is recommended for most newer vehicles these days. The ILSAC standards referenced specify the API performance grade of the oil as well as specifying the maximum amount of ZDP and the inclusion of friction modifiers to improve fuel economy. Any oil that is ILSAC rated "For Gasoline Engines" is of a known performance level. The oil life monitor assumes this performance level. If you put SA rated "virgin motor oil" from the dollar store in your motor the oil life monitor is way optomisit and the oil would need to be changed much sooner than it indicates. If you used Rotella T oil then the oil lfe monitor reading will be way conservative. Use the recommended oil and the oil life monitor will be accurate for your vehicle. Remember that the oil lfe monitor is always calibrated considering worst case degradation and has a significant safety factor built in so even if the oil you get along the way is not quilte up to the latest ILSAC or API spec you are still unlikely to damage anything. So...yes, use of oil other than what the manufacturer recommends will change or affect the accuracy of the oil life monitor.

The oil life monitor safety factor mentioned takes into account an aging engine. I would say that most modern engines would easily go 150,000 to 200,000 miles before blowby becomes significant greater so as to affect the accuracy of the oil life indicator so it is not really a concern in my book.

The fact that so many different variables would have to be analyzed to determine the existing "life" of the oil makes it unlikely a simple tester could do the job. Even some of the commercially available oil analyses do not give you all the information to accurately determine oil life and you need several analyses to establish the slope of the oil degradation curve, not just an analysis at one point. Having said that, the oil quality sensors availabe in some vehicles do a reasonale job of measuring the health of the oil considering many of the factors. But even thouse cannot see all the variables necesary so some of the indicated oil life is modeled.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
<snip>....or anyone else for that matter.
I'm someone else....

As an engine ages will the oil change indicator become less accurate since one of the traits of an aging engine is slightly reduced oil pressure*?
I'm not so sure that's* true? But, I will tell you that there's a commonly accepted engine life model -- the 'bathtub' model -- where an engine's life compares to a side-view of an ordinary bathtub. Initially, the wear rates are high (the vertical end of the tub) and then for the life of the engine (however long that is -- depends on many factors) the wear metals and other normal factors run along at low levels (the bottom of the tub); and then, near the end of the engines life, the wear metals begin to slowly rise (the tapered-up end of the tub).

Will the use of different oil (something other than what the manufacturer recommends) also change the effectiveness of the indicator?
IMO, oils that meet the manufacturer's specifications don't tend to be a variable in long-term oil analysis testing. IOW, the oil is not a factor. I was involved in a long-term oil analysis with record keeping with an engine that had a well-developed base-line maintenence schedule. To test this (concept) I purchased some Red Owl (grocery chain) oil that met the manufacturer's specs -- didn't change the anaysis one bit.

It all sounds pretty cool but I am still suspicious. I wish you could buy an affordable tester where you put a couple drops of oil in a devise that would compute oxidation, viscosity, and contamination level. I would absolutely buy one of them.
Oil analysis (from an idependent lab) isn't really that expensive (in the whole scheme of things) and analysis from oil companies is cheaper yet (but, not independent).

As for the company that we can't talk about here anymore (they're from Superior WI) -- they didn't fare well at our (independent) lab. My take was: their claims were just waay too 'out there'.... :unsure:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
These things are a handy guide, but that's about it.

As Jestal and I mentioned, there's all sorts of caveats on oil monitors. Some are blunt simple and are little more than a backward-counting odometer. Some incorporate all sorts of sensors. Neither will know if you live on the end of a long dusty road and should change your oil more frequently. If your monitor is simple and you run continuously hot, or sit for long periods like a police/service vehicle, the monitor may not be accurate. My wife and I tend to put on more miles than the average vehicle and do it in hour-long stages, so I change less often than Jiffy-Lube advertises. YMMV

It still comes down to learning what you have and you judging what you think is right.

Bob

 
With all thats been written here, all the indicator talk, all the synthetic vs dino discussion, all the speculation, engineering rap, and opinions pro and con, one fact remains. It may sometimes (maybe even often) be somewhat a waste of money (though not much IMHO) and precious limited resources (not), but no one has ever gone wrong using the 3000 mile change interval irregardless of all other factors included. I have seen obscene examples of people trying to prove this or that syn oil's ability to go 25k and beyond, exotic oil filter systems, sample testing, ad nauseam. With all of that, I have yet to see a single motor that had the oil changed too often exhibit any behavior other than lasting much longer than the manufacturer expected, and requiring much less in the way of tuning and component repair in the process, while producing at or near rated power throughout it's extended life. This also goes for tranny's, cooling systems etc. Service them often, you will find they are capable of much longer life than one has grown to expect.

 
I'll have to re-read my posts but I don't think oil pressure was mentioned. In any case oil pressure is not part of the engine oil life monitor calculation.
I mentioned oil pressure because a lot of my research indicated that oil pressure is one of the factors manufacturers use to determine oil life. Makes sense when you think of it. Some vehicles have higher oil pressure at higher RPMs. While others have a constant oil flow rate regardless of engine RPM.

All in all, very neat stuff. Thanks again Jestal for all the good info.

here is a link to an SAE article some of you may want to read.SAE International

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can we add an extra 500 posts to Jestal's totals for the amazingly detailed information he has provided here??

Thanks! That was exceptionally helpful for me (and my wife) for her 2006 Wagon Queen Family Truckster (aka Odyssey).

 
I basically agree with Rad's assessment of the situation. That is why , for instance, I recommended an oil change after a track day in the other post. Lots of variables and the only safe answer, given the unknowns, is to change the oil. We always joke about wearing out the drain plug is the only risk there.

The disagreement I have with a 3000 mile change interval is that it is not often enough for some people some of the time in winter, short trip driving. Changing the oil at 3000 is way sooner than necessary in most cases but not all. A better approach would be to change at 3000 or if the oil life monitor pops up, whichever is first, if you don't want to run the oil to the limit of the oil life monitor all the time.

Realize that this audience is primarily enthusiates that like to take care of things and generally would err toward the side of more changes than necessary. That is not representative of the overall population and many customers. The oil life monitor was initially developed to tell the owner ACCURATELY when to change the oil as even a "3000 mile change interval" is not really accurate nor does it have sufficient safety factor in many cases. Most customers read the owners manual and assume they can use the longest change interval mentioned, when, in reality, they should be using the shorter (severe service) or something in between.

The research work that lead to the development of an accurate oil life monitor proved that the oil remained serviceable well beyond "standard" guidelines in many cases. It also lead to the improved standards implemented in the ILSAC GF2 and GF3 requirements that make the oil last even longer in service.

There is more merit to the cost savings and wasting of natural resources arguments than some people will acknowlege but I'll leave that alone. There are two other reasons for the oil life monitors that get overlooked.....

One is to keep the car out of the dealer and out of the service bay. Everyone has a horror story of their buddy's friend's car that was ruined by the quickie oil change place leaving the drainplug loose or from putting coolant in the crankcase, etc..... True or false mistakes are made and the only way to prevent them (and improve customer satisfaction) is to prevent the need for working on the car....i.e...maximize the oil life to eliminate X number of oil changes. There is also the potential "upsell" issue where the customer takes their car in for a simple oil change and gets talked into multiple additives, replacing other parts, etc..... Most of this is totally unnecessary and ends up hurting customer satisfaction as the customer thinks they should do all this stuff because the "pick your brand" dealer MUST be representing the factory.....right...??? I have personally been appalled at some of the bills customers have been handed where only a simple service oil change was required.

The other reason is the EPA. The EPA was on a tear many years ago regarding the waste oil stream and what is done with waste oil and waste oil in filters thrown away in landfills. There were "suggestions" within the industry that the EPA was heading toward a "sealed hood" requirement to eliminate the waste oil problem. Bear in mind, that, to us, the waste oil problem is a non-problem and easy to deal with but the EPA answer was to make it a requirement of the auto companies to not require oil changes. This is a ludicrous idea, of course, but the fact that we developed a system to help minimize the number of oil changes and minimize the waste oil stream helped head this potential fiasco off.

If you think the waste oil comments are BS then talk to some of the European riders and find out what is involved with oil changes and desposing of waste oil. Many of the European car companies were into extended change intervals long before the US simply due to government pressure from the greenies.

While you aren't going to hurt anything changing the oil too soon (other than wear out the drain plug.... :D :D :D ) you really aren't going to hurt anything by following the oil life monitor, either. The system (on GM vehicles, anyway) has sufficient safety factor to not run the oil to the absolute limit of it's service life and the engines have been designed to accomodate this. Just don't try to apply the extended change ideas and oils to pre-oil life monitor vehicles as it likely will not work out well. As far as extended service claims from certain oil marketiers, you know where I stand on that.

 
You mean it is how the manufacturer made it??

I don't understand your question....please clearify.
It's okay, Jestal. I don't think he'd understand the answer. Anyway, I think he's been outed as a troll and dealt with by the Iggmeister.

The door made an interesting "ker-pal" sound as it hit his ass on the way out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You mean it is how the manufacturer made it??

I don't understand your question....please clearify.
It's okay, Jestal. I don't think he'd understand the answer. Anyway, I think he's been outed as a troll and dealt with by the Iggmeister.

The door made an interesting "ker-pal" sound as it hit his ass on the way out.
Oops. yes. I tried to leave the few threads he got a response and get rid of the rest (like 11 STOOPID posts...trust me). This is one I moved after jestal had responded. In fact, I've just moved his posts here...like a museum exhibit.

Yes, you are seeing the remnants of a troll that had infiltrated our ranks for weeks folks...and we only noticed now. If anybody ever wonders why I'm sometimes short with newbies...it's because I wonder if they might be ****** like this that are wasting our time.

I'm thinking we need a Troll Posse to keep order. I know Scab, TWN, MadMike2, and others find them now and again. I happen to spot this one, but didn't put 2 + 2 together for weeks. He's been spewing troll splooge before he finally got stomped on.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top