Knifemaker
Not me
Fred W wrote:
"Great job! Those both look fantastic. I'm betting the diners were all wildly enthusiastic.
What did you think about the babies vs. your normal St Louis cuts? I've found that you have to keep a close eye on them and test when to get them off the heat at around 5 hour mark based on the bend test. I've heard the longer ribs take a bit longer."
Everyone loved the ribs. And the loin too. General consensus from those, including me, that have had my St. Louis ribs was....the baby backs were way better. Biggest reason was there was more meat on the bones, and it was more tender (and not as "stringy" as the STL cut) Also they had much less fat. They came out perfectly done in my opinion, which of course helped....they were literally "fall off the bone tender" (you can see in the photo how there's just some empty bones there that just popped out of the meat while I was slicing them up)
Both the ribs and the loins got heavily covered with Meatheads rub.
I cooked the ribs exactly 4 hours and ten minutes at 220-225...(which stayed there pretty well through the whole cook) when I pulled the loin at 2-1/2 hours, I sprayed down the ribs with a mix of pepsicola and filtered water. I did not sauce them until I wrapped them in the foil. They did sit in the oven wrapped in the foil for an hour and a half at 190 degrees, which likely did help with the tenderness.
The cook time I'm thankful for....as I originally was going to smoke them 6 hours like I do the Saint Louis ribs, but I went online (to the Amazing Ribs site) and saw they reccomended only cooking BB's 3-4 hours....5 if real "meaty", but not having done them before was not sure how "meaty" my ribs were. I liked they way they "looked" at 4 hours, so I just pulled them out then, and....my instinct paid off..
So, yeah, I'll be doing the Babies from now on, the shorter cook time just being another advantage over the St. Louis ribs.
I think your experiment with the loins only failed because you smoked the loins too long, not sure why they came out more salty than the loin you pulled sooner, perhaps the salt just got "cooked in" more, as the loin pulled at 145 likely excreted some of its salt into the juice? As what to do with it, you could chop it up and put it in something spicey, like chili, or, take the slices and make jerky with them.
(And oh yes, 3 racks went straight into the freezer for later)
"Great job! Those both look fantastic. I'm betting the diners were all wildly enthusiastic.
What did you think about the babies vs. your normal St Louis cuts? I've found that you have to keep a close eye on them and test when to get them off the heat at around 5 hour mark based on the bend test. I've heard the longer ribs take a bit longer."
Everyone loved the ribs. And the loin too. General consensus from those, including me, that have had my St. Louis ribs was....the baby backs were way better. Biggest reason was there was more meat on the bones, and it was more tender (and not as "stringy" as the STL cut) Also they had much less fat. They came out perfectly done in my opinion, which of course helped....they were literally "fall off the bone tender" (you can see in the photo how there's just some empty bones there that just popped out of the meat while I was slicing them up)
Both the ribs and the loins got heavily covered with Meatheads rub.
I cooked the ribs exactly 4 hours and ten minutes at 220-225...(which stayed there pretty well through the whole cook) when I pulled the loin at 2-1/2 hours, I sprayed down the ribs with a mix of pepsicola and filtered water. I did not sauce them until I wrapped them in the foil. They did sit in the oven wrapped in the foil for an hour and a half at 190 degrees, which likely did help with the tenderness.
The cook time I'm thankful for....as I originally was going to smoke them 6 hours like I do the Saint Louis ribs, but I went online (to the Amazing Ribs site) and saw they reccomended only cooking BB's 3-4 hours....5 if real "meaty", but not having done them before was not sure how "meaty" my ribs were. I liked they way they "looked" at 4 hours, so I just pulled them out then, and....my instinct paid off..
So, yeah, I'll be doing the Babies from now on, the shorter cook time just being another advantage over the St. Louis ribs.
I think your experiment with the loins only failed because you smoked the loins too long, not sure why they came out more salty than the loin you pulled sooner, perhaps the salt just got "cooked in" more, as the loin pulled at 145 likely excreted some of its salt into the juice? As what to do with it, you could chop it up and put it in something spicey, like chili, or, take the slices and make jerky with them.
(And oh yes, 3 racks went straight into the freezer for later)
Last edited by a moderator: