Summary
Warning: Gen 1 bikes that are "tickers" do not always audibly tick. Beware.
Details
I took my '05 (bought new and now only 53,000 miles young) into Roseville Yamaha earlier this week for its 2nd valve check, replacement of the Cam chain tensioner and hydraulic lines, and other maintenance. Even though this dealer is a couple of hours drive from my home, I've brought my bike into them the past couple of times on the strength of their service department's specific expertise in matters FJR.
After dropping the bike off, I got a call back several hours later from the service manager, Zac Mickel. They'd done a "blow down test" and compared it to the baseline from the service they performed on the bike last March. "It's down 20 to 30 percent across the board", says Zac.
They strongly suspected worn valve guides, but would have to pull the head to know for sure. As these bikes have gotten older, they've been seeing cases where "tickers" aren't always actually audibly ticking! Yet the valve guides are becoming worn in the same manner - enough so that the valves are not sealing correctly, allowing carbon composites to form and cause further problems.
So the $64,000 questions for Gen 1 bikes now would seem to be not whether you have a "ticker"; but rather, do you have worn valve guides - audibly ticking or not. Also, I can't say I noticed any performance degradation. Perhaps it was merely insidious enough to be below my observation threshold.
The bike has been out of warranty since April, but because this was a slowly progressing problem that started while the bike was under YES warranty, yet had gone undiagnosed by the dealer, Zac got Yamaha to agree to cover the cost of parts as goodwill. I would cover the labor costs. Given the alternative, this seems fair enough to me. It amounts to about a 50/50 cost split.
Now I can see that a manufacturer would naturally want to cap its liability exposure for mechanical issues as the bike fleet ages. And while the additional cost is a sting, it won't break the bank, and I'll have a happier bike with years more riding enjoyment.
I talked with Zac again today. They had pulled the head and the valve guides are indeed worn as they suspected. The bike'll be down for a couple of weeks, but I know it's in good, capable hands, and I'm glad I took the trouble to go further afield to bring the bike into them. I doubt if my local dealer would have caught this problem, nor gone to bat for me with Yamaha.
Note: edited for accuracy.
Warning: Gen 1 bikes that are "tickers" do not always audibly tick. Beware.
Details
I took my '05 (bought new and now only 53,000 miles young) into Roseville Yamaha earlier this week for its 2nd valve check, replacement of the Cam chain tensioner and hydraulic lines, and other maintenance. Even though this dealer is a couple of hours drive from my home, I've brought my bike into them the past couple of times on the strength of their service department's specific expertise in matters FJR.
After dropping the bike off, I got a call back several hours later from the service manager, Zac Mickel. They'd done a "blow down test" and compared it to the baseline from the service they performed on the bike last March. "It's down 20 to 30 percent across the board", says Zac.
They strongly suspected worn valve guides, but would have to pull the head to know for sure. As these bikes have gotten older, they've been seeing cases where "tickers" aren't always actually audibly ticking! Yet the valve guides are becoming worn in the same manner - enough so that the valves are not sealing correctly, allowing carbon composites to form and cause further problems.
So the $64,000 questions for Gen 1 bikes now would seem to be not whether you have a "ticker"; but rather, do you have worn valve guides - audibly ticking or not. Also, I can't say I noticed any performance degradation. Perhaps it was merely insidious enough to be below my observation threshold.
The bike has been out of warranty since April, but because this was a slowly progressing problem that started while the bike was under YES warranty, yet had gone undiagnosed by the dealer, Zac got Yamaha to agree to cover the cost of parts as goodwill. I would cover the labor costs. Given the alternative, this seems fair enough to me. It amounts to about a 50/50 cost split.
Now I can see that a manufacturer would naturally want to cap its liability exposure for mechanical issues as the bike fleet ages. And while the additional cost is a sting, it won't break the bank, and I'll have a happier bike with years more riding enjoyment.
I talked with Zac again today. They had pulled the head and the valve guides are indeed worn as they suspected. The bike'll be down for a couple of weeks, but I know it's in good, capable hands, and I'm glad I took the trouble to go further afield to bring the bike into them. I doubt if my local dealer would have caught this problem, nor gone to bat for me with Yamaha.
Note: edited for accuracy.
Last edited by a moderator: