What we got here is failia' to communicate...
I am not expecting manufacturers to do anything. I suspect they do market whatever is profitable.
My point is, if there is any point, is simply noting that sports-touring bike are a compromise and thus, neither fully sports, not fully touring. It would be nice if there was a full touring bike for those of us who donot practice the 'sports' mode. Rather than buy a bike like an FJR and pour 2500 worth of farkle in order to make it commuter friendly. My ideal would be more like a Goldwing ergonomics and FJR torque, a good fairing, a well thought out set up to travel: higway pegs, GPS, big shield, comfy seat, great luggage space, lights, rack, a superhorn etc.
While in the conversation, I also noted that I am not sure what people mean when they say 'sport' riding, cause my reference of that means 'on the track' and with a sports bike, not a bucket on two wheels like sports touring models. You might get offended that the FJR is not a bucket on two wheels, but it is if you would pit it against sports bike of the sort it would be a bucket on the track. I don't believe the C14, the ST, the FJR, the TT, nor the GL are good bikes to improve your time on a track. But what I do see and experience is that all the people around me who own sport-touring bike that claim they are going 'sports' riding, are basically driving fast around curves on public byways. Is that what is meant by sports riding?
And I 'll also point out that riding at much higher speed than the posted limit--as most of us do on these bikes on 'twisties--is a dangerous thing. One never knows if there 'll be a stalled car, a oil puddle, a rock, or some unexpected pedestrian, jogger, dog, etc when riding on public byways like a racer wannabe. Of course, riding skills vary.
No one has to agree with me. Just my thoughts for the sake of conversation.