If you think about the purpose of the CO settings feature, it only makes sense that all of the new ECUs should come with the same standard set of settings that represent the average requirements of bikes. After all, they cannot possibly know what will be required on a bike by bike basis with out making CO measurements on each cylinder on each bike.
10, 10, 10, 10 has to be wrong. The ECU must have missed the step in the QA process where they load the "average" values. Unless you have some reason not to, I would set the values to the same ones that every other ECU has been reported to have come with: 5, 18, 18, 21 and then adjust from there.
10, 10, 10, 10 has to be wrong. The ECU must have missed the step in the QA process where they load the "average" values. Unless you have some reason not to, I would set the values to the same ones that every other ECU has been reported to have come with: 5, 18, 18, 21 and then adjust from there.
Last edited by a moderator: