It seems that most of you would like to see the FJR loaded up with so much **** that the average guy can no longer afford to buy one. I got my '03 for $11,500 and though many were getting them back then for much less, that seemed like a hell of a bargain. I guess some of you won't be happy until the FJR sells in the $20,000 range.
Scott Harrison
Senatobia, MS
Excellent argument! :good: But keep in mind that many of us farkle it up to 20 large anyway - granted, that's our choice, though.
:blink: I agree with Scott, what some of you want as "standard" equipment, you might as well buy a Goldwing.
I found the lessor weight, lower price, yet better performance, big considerations in choosing the FJR over the competition.
We are a diverse and huge group with a wide range of "must haves" on our personal list of farkles to personalize our FJR's to our exact liking. But, what one person's "must have" is the next person's "you have got to be kidding".
I owned a '05 FJR and presently own a '06 FJR.
I do believe the following "problem" items have been solved with the '06 model;
-heat problems have essentially been solved with the '06 model
-small # of ticking valve problems on '03 to '05 models aren't present on '06 models
-buffeting and negative pressure encountered on '03-'05 models are pretty much
eliminated on the '06-'07s.
-adjusting headlight aim due to load differences is easily accomplished on the '06-'07s.
-usable stator output has been increased on the '06-'07A's
I would propose to Yamaha that they lose weight, 60 to 70 lbs...it's a sport-tourer, not a Goldwing light.
I would ask that Yamaha not get caught up in the bigger is better race that you see among the cruiser crowd that has seen displacement jump from 1200 to 1400 to 1500 to 1600 to 1800 ccs for very little gain in performance but end result is just a lot more weight and empty bragging rights about engine displacement. You can get an amazing amount of tractible, smooth, dependable, torque filled, eye ball popping performance from engines in the 1200 to 1300cc range. I know the knee jerk reaction right now might be; well Kawasaki has a 1400 cc engine on their sport-tourer, so we have to go one bigger then them.
I would propose Yamaha utilize higher quality suspension components on the front and rear end...Yamaha owns Ohlins. There is no reason they can't use those top shelf components that have a longer life, greater range and are rebuildable.
I would propose Yamaha incorporate two 12volt outlets; one in the front fairing area that can be utilized to power the GPS, radar detector, communication gear, cell phone and XM radios that so many of you seem enamored of. The second 12volt outlet would be located on the left side below the drivers seat that could be utilized to power heated clothing or recharging a battery or keeping the battery charged with a Battery Tender or similar device. Both 12 volt outlets should be weather-proof, utilize heavy enough gauge wiring to handle a significant wattage, amperage, voltage encountered when powering heated clothing or charging a battery. Total additional cost and weight of wiring and outlets would be about $29 and 18 ozs.
Yamaha, whatever engineer designed the 12volt outlet that is in the compartment on the '06-'07 should not be allowed to design the location of the of two twelve twelve volt outlets...putting a 12volt outlet inside a compartment with a panel door that has to be opened to access the outlet was not very lucid thinking.
I do believe a great number of us who put miles on the FJR every year have installed some sort of throttle lock or an audiovox cruise control. Cruise control should be installed in future models, cost per unit would be less then $100 (economy of scale) and the extra weight of all cables and vacuum unit, control unit would be under 25 ozs. Witness all of us who have installed audiovox cruise controls.
Throttle spring tension should be decreased, no need for such a heavy throttle spring tension.
Yamaha, know your customer profile. Though most us believe we have sporting tendancies, most of us are of the age where our eyesight isn't what it was when we were twenty year old college students.
I would surmise ninety percent of FJR owners are over 42, we wear reading glasses, make the numbers on the speedometer larger.
If your wondering how to do this without "crowding", it's simple, you don't have to have 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 etc., etc., on the speedo, you can eliminate the 10, 30, 50, 70 etc., etc., and enlarge the 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 etc., etc., on the analog speedo face and put a heavier hash mark to denote the odd numbers...it works great on my Acura vehicle and I never have a question about how fast I'm going.
Keep the analog dial as most digital displays I have seen get washed out in bright sunlight and are overly bright in the dark of the night.
Keep the shaft drive, we don't want to go back to tensioning and lubing chains ala Ducati STS4 and Triumph Tiger sport tourers. I am quite content with five speed transmission on my '06.
The turn signal indicators on the '03-'05 models were too prominant, the indicators on the '06-'07 models too small, need to find the happy medium in-between.
Seat height adjustment on the '06-'07 was a improvement, but not carried far enough. There are enough of us vertically challenged and head in the cloud owners we need a greater range. Have a three position seat instead of two. A middle of the road setting and then a lower setting 1.25 inches lower, then a higher setting 1.25 inches above the middle setting. The plastic injected seat height adjuster on the '06-'07 model can't weigh more then 4 ozs. and certainly wouldn't be an expensive item to tool an injection mold for.
A greater range in the adjustable handlebar would also be appreciated.
None of the items I have enumerated would be a great increase in expense and weight.
I would depend on the engineers to do what they could in frame, engine, wheel, axel, brake rotor, muffler, etc., etc., design to cut excess weight.
I remember reading an article where BMW engineers made it a goal to lose more then 60 lbs on one of their models and they were able to exceed their goal and make a vast improvement over the previous year's model.
Yamaha, are you up to the challenge?
P.S. sorry about the incomplete posting earlier, hit the wrong key before I was finished and it went out onto the board!
Scott M. Chan
Decatur, TX.