LowAndSilent
Well-known member
Thanks for posting them up!
That's interesting to see who is playing what strategy.
That's interesting to see who is playing what strategy.
Oh, no, no, no... you have to be referring to someone else; I never said/typed that. I would *suspect* a rather hefty number would dash up to score Blaine, if just to have that in their hip pocket for Legs 2 and 3.There were a heck of a lot more than 15 that rode to Blaine. I believe Warchild put the number closer to 90% of the field headed there, and judging by the number of bikes we saw headed back southbound as we headed up I5 towards that corner, I'd say Warchild was right.
& at least one guy who just signed up to FRJForum today to subscribe to this thread... h34r:We are obviously a hot topic here on FJRForum.... lots of guests here....
Y'all have the best insight on the rally!We are obviously a hot topic here on FJRForum.... lots of guests here....
Many will have to in oder to see the photos... dumb-*** forum software upgrade has stymied us as to why, after the upgrade was installed, that guests see photos as links only... not too ******* happy with this IP.Board 3.1.2 right now... :angry:& at least one guy who just signed up to FRJForum today to subscribe to this thread... h34r:
This is really important information. Given the "throwback" theme this year, I wasn't sure if the recent history of escalating point values would hold true.<snip>There were some excellent arguments by IBR vets I talked to the morning of the Start who described why they are blowing off the 4-Corners altogether. Mostly because of the reasons already provided by IBR vets in this thread:
- later in the rally, we may determine 4800 points may be a piddly amount in the grand scheme of things.
- if the above is true, that's waaaaaay too many miles for minimal points.
- as hinted by rally staff, the smart money bets on ever-increasing capital point values later in the rally.
Yeah, sux for family members who want to see RRs as well.Many will have to in order to see the photos... dumb-*** forum software upgrade has stymied us as to why, after the upgrade was installed, that guests see photos as links only... not too ******* happy with this IP.Board 3.1.2 right now... :angry:
That's one thing I did document Monday and counted 16 of the 44 that went to Blaine.But 90% of the field? Pretty sure that's not accurate, though I do not know the actual number of riders who scarfed up Blaine.
Just drew a circle around the group of riders on the 10:15 CST map...if you rode that circle around them, you'd have to travel about 2000 miles!That's one thing I did document Monday and counted 16 of the 44 that went to Blaine.But 90% of the field? Pretty sure that's not accurate, though I do not know the actual number of riders who scarfed up Blaine.
You're right. Gone back and corrected it. Wayyyy too early in the morning for me to be posting. Thanks for the correction Matt.-snip-
Oh, no, no, no... you have to be referring to someone else; I never said/typed that. I would *suspect* a rather hefty number would dash up to score Blaine, if just to have that in their hip pocket for Legs 2 and 3.
But 90% of the field? Pretty sure that's not accurate, though I do not know the actual number of riders who scarfed up Blaine.
-snip-
Willie,I got a planning questions for the vets...What is average speed realistically attainable on these legs. An Average of 50 to 60 ? I know my SS1K I averaged about 62.5MPH but that was for just 24 hours, but this is totally different. I can't wait to see the point values for the capitals or is that capitols.
Willie
Easily.Or do you throw out the plan after 48 hours?
Enter your email address to join: