ionbeam
2 FUN
This is an automotive cruise control intended for cars and trucks with much slower ignition firing rates. It has to work on older vehicles as well as newer one. The manual only says to hook the blue wire to the ground side of the coil and select Coil or ECU. In some vehicles the ground side of the coil may either be a point set or the output of an ignition module. This would constitute the 'Coil' selection for DIP switch position 7. If the ignition system has an ignition module, the module would be receiving a square shaped pulse of some duty cycle from the PCM/ECU. This relatively clean pulse will drive the ignition module which isolates the switching of coil’s primary winding. You would select the ECU position in this case.
The FJR's ECU is directly grounding the negative side of the coil via the orange and gray/red wire. The kick back voltage from the primary side of the coil can be pretty wild looking with a point breaker system. The FJR ECU will make some effort to snub the back EMF as well as dampen the ringing.
The Servo's only active component is a modified error amplifier style electrical motor controller. The AVCC servo receives the coil/ECU signal, then with only minor filtering and voltage clamping by passive devices the signal is fed directly to the servo's controller. I don't have the chip data sheet for the proprietary servo chip but I can speculate that the coil/ECU DIP switch sets up different forms of internal digital filtering for the signal.
It is good design practice to place the signal source as close to the controller as possible, especially in 'dirty' electrical environments like a motorcycle. I'm betting that the signal on a shortened blue wire, tapped as close to the ECU as possible is a much cleaner signal. Depending on the amount of electrical dampening done by the ECU, the signal is more likely to resemble a square wave than a normal ringing DQ signal off of the coil's ground wire. I have PMed a couple of people some screen shots of a point ignition wave vs an ECU signal that triggers an ignition module. I've got them up on Photobucket if anyone is interested.
At some point I guess that Fred and I could have an O’scope session and see if there are any differences in the way the Gen I and Gen II ECUs fire the coils.
The FJR's ECU is directly grounding the negative side of the coil via the orange and gray/red wire. The kick back voltage from the primary side of the coil can be pretty wild looking with a point breaker system. The FJR ECU will make some effort to snub the back EMF as well as dampen the ringing.
The Servo's only active component is a modified error amplifier style electrical motor controller. The AVCC servo receives the coil/ECU signal, then with only minor filtering and voltage clamping by passive devices the signal is fed directly to the servo's controller. I don't have the chip data sheet for the proprietary servo chip but I can speculate that the coil/ECU DIP switch sets up different forms of internal digital filtering for the signal.
It is good design practice to place the signal source as close to the controller as possible, especially in 'dirty' electrical environments like a motorcycle. I'm betting that the signal on a shortened blue wire, tapped as close to the ECU as possible is a much cleaner signal. Depending on the amount of electrical dampening done by the ECU, the signal is more likely to resemble a square wave than a normal ringing DQ signal off of the coil's ground wire. I have PMed a couple of people some screen shots of a point ignition wave vs an ECU signal that triggers an ignition module. I've got them up on Photobucket if anyone is interested.
At some point I guess that Fred and I could have an O’scope session and see if there are any differences in the way the Gen I and Gen II ECUs fire the coils.
Last edited by a moderator: