Hey Blue wing,How about getting yamaha to publicly come out and say that and give some of these fjr owners some piece of mind?
Yamaha has said so. It has done so at least twice in separate publications. Now that's just their current
policy at the moment so it doesn't have the force of an actual extension to the official warranty, so it's not ironclad.
Back to the original question, I view it as a tough call. On average, extended warranties are a bad value. Extended warranties are a form of insurance, and insurance companies don't offer insurance unless there is the expectation that, on average, they'll rake in more in premiums than they pay out in claims. But that's on average and the averages may not apply if, 1) you believe the bike will have more than an average number of problems; and/or 2) you can get a deal on the insurance at less than the average rate. $400 is pretty cheap.
And there is the peace of mind argument. Insurance is worth it if it lets you sleep at night. Sleep is more important then money.
One thing I don't like about extended warranties is that it keeps you on the hook to keep maintenance records and to hassle with the dealer if you want to make a claim. They're usually pretty good about accepting owner maintenance records, but you could get into a gray area if you had a failure that could be directly related to a lack of maintenance. For example, I wonder how Yamaha would look at a simple notation in a logbook of "Check valves, found Okay" at 26K miles if a valve was burned due to lack of clearance to 30K. It might get sticky. With no warranty, you just fix it yourself and move on.
I'm simply postponing the decision until near the time the 1-year warranty expires.
- Mark