MadRussian
Well-known member
After you own a bike with 195rwhp, they all seem slow...
On that note, I can't wait for it be warm enough to ride my FJR.
On that note, I can't wait for it be warm enough to ride my FJR.
Hey, I guess you missed us Tuesday at Chatham Tap. I think you may have entered on the right side and we were on the left side. Have you considered riding with some of us down to Arkansas at the end of March?After you own a bike with 195rwhp, they all seem slow...
On that note, I can't wait for it be warm enough to ride my FJR.
Not even in the same zip code when it comes to a drag race!Don't think of % or time, since those are more difficult to visualize. Think of distance. If my math is correct, half a second at about 120 mph = 88 feet, almost the length of 12 fjr's or 2½ school busses.
At some point the gear ratios have to come into play, not just the torque and horsepower numbers. I am just guessing here but I would think that a "power cruiser" might be geared lower due to its intended purpose.Not so sure about the hole shot advantage either, even though the Suzuki has a much bigger displacement.
FJR 99.1 lb ft applied to 637 lbs = .155
M109 118 lb ft applied to 764 lbs = .154
That says they should come off the line very closely.
The FJR isn't exactly a short, wheelie prone bike either ya know. "WAY harder"? Hardly....I think the 109 will take the FJR in a 1/8th mile *DRAG* race. Long wheelbase, big back tire, gearing means you can get on that puppy hard off the line without fear. WAY harder than an FJR. 1/4 ,mile, my money shifts over the FJR.
Enter your email address to join: