olsonm3915
Well-known member
No doubt there are.IMO, there are some definite advantages of having the phone forwarded thru the GPS device.
The Sena SMH10 does a good job of prioritizing the various sources.Perhaps the biggest is that you get the caller ID right up on the GPS screen (big, easy to read) and can decide on the fly whether to answer the call (or not) with a touch of the screen. Otherwise you need to decide to blindly accept (or reject) all incoming calls. There is no way I'd be able to read the tiny screen of my crackberry while riding. In some cases I need to take work related calls on the fly. In others I'll intentionally klet it roll to voice mail as a screening mechanism and then call my VM to find out if it's worth calling them back.
The GPS also automatically prioritizes the various audio signals that it generates. Not sure how that would work with having multiple devices paired to your BT headset.
I also like being able to manipulate the phone's features thru the GPS. When I want to initiate a call I can leave my gloves on, find the recipient in my phone's address book, and place the call all via the GPS touch screen (after pulling over to the side of the road, of course!).
If it works for you that's great. I just don't think that is the optimum arrangement.
Your primary complaint about not pairing your phone through the GPS seems to be about losing of all the useful functionality the GPS provides for making and receiving phone calls. I agree those features are very nice to have, in fact they can be essential for some people.
But for me, they are practically irrelevant, since I am not obligated to take any calls on my cell while riding, and in fact most of the time I would simply dismiss the call and let it go to voicemail. Obviously, our priorities and needs differ. And as I pointed out, the one thing I figure I might as well have with the Sena is the ability to answer phone calls while in motion if I choose to, which is a simple tap of the phone button, or I can even set up the SMH10 to answer the phone via a voice command if I choose. So I really see no downside at all to my situation, since the features I am losing out on simply would not get used.
So for people for whom full phone control is not required, the combination I have works extremely well. I think it's good to tease out the differences between systems so that folks can evaluate these sort of nuances before plunking down their money. No particular solution is going to be optimum for everyone, when cost is brought into the equation- my GPS + the AquaBox and RAM mounting stuff was about $225, whereas the Zumo 220 is about $430 and the most expensive Zumo 665 is about $800, (both prices are before adding RAM mounts).
Sure, a Zumo would be nicer, being waterproof and having the phone integration features while connected to the Bluetooth headset, but to save $200 to $550, I can live with the minor limitations of my setup. Maybe after I've used this for a while I'll decide the bulk of the AquaBox is too annoying and I'll spring for the Zumo anyway, in which case I will have a really nice bonus Nuvi 765T GPS for the car.