Dwavey
Well-known member
Unless you're in Canada where most of us don't have guns. Come to think of it, that was a Canadian bear, which means it probably didn't have a gun, which explains why that hunter was able to kill it with his gun.Depends. If the animal is a human, you've got to be pretty good. Otherwise, you just wing 'em. Then those sumbitches shoot back.What is "so good" about shooting at animals with a high powered rifle from afar??
My personal view is that the only people who need such high powered firearms are the military and police. A shotgun will suffice for farmers to protect their herd animals. As for hunting, at least make it a contest, try using a bow. If they want a real contest, take on that grizzly with a knife, or even better, with their teeth and nails, the same as the grizzly.
Here's a question: If animals of all types need management just like any other resource, instead of letting Mother Nature do it, then shouldn't it be legal to hunt humans? Especially in cities? I mean, many feel that the human population is out of control and causing tremendous stress on the global environment.
Then again, looking at places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Darfur, maybe there is a legalized human hunt. Or is that just Mother Nature having us cull ourselves in a way that is natural for humans? Just a thought...