Continuing the risk of NEPRT -- I asked my LEO brother this question. He is on the side of the current no gear/open face helmet outlook. The reasons he gave were on the same lines as (don't think, repeat after me, glazed eyes) dogma of Loud Pipes Saves Lives. They were points but there was no valid reason given. The officers need to be quickly and easily identified as a LEO (sew police id on a 'Stich?). Can't access gear like guns, writing tools, radios, etc. How hard would it be to add appropriate pockets and secure gun attachment point? Look at what they do to modify a street bike into a police bike, can't that be done to the rider's gear too? As a rider I cringe when I look at a LEO with no gear...for the absolutely love of PETE, I'll NEVER understand why Police motorcyclists don't wear a modular helmet...
Seems like a good compromise would be to get good armored gloves, but cut the trigger finger off of the gloves. Wouldn't be perfect for decterity...but a compromise in a situation where the gloves couldn't be taken off before a gun was required.I donno where those guys work, but we have been in modular helmets for years. The pants and shirts still suck, but now we are even wearing armored jackets...sometimes.
Gloves are always a ***** because good armored gloves cause a big loss of dexterity and fine motor skills. Also, good fitting armored gloves are hard to put on and take off.
However; seems departments around here are getting the hint.
Gunny!Nice but it's been done already. Posted on the 5th of December "When Pigs Fly", and again on the 13th "Big Speed Bump".
Enter your email address to join: