petey
Well-known member
No comments???You guys that installed a PCIII, how did it affect the fuel milage? I heard of cases where the milage went from the mid to high 40's to mid to high 30's.
No comments???You guys that installed a PCIII, how did it affect the fuel milage? I heard of cases where the milage went from the mid to high 40's to mid to high 30's.
For me, the PCIII in my 2006 AE didn't help with your comment quoted above. I've given up with riding the twisties due to this fact and only "tour" with my FJR to/from work and "touring" on the weekends (freeways).But the FJR doesn't corner worth a damn, thanks to that fooked up throttle.
Wheaty, you lie, careful, yes.....I just ride it slowly and make sure I am very slow and careful in the twisties...
818,For me, the PCIII in my 2006 AE didn't help with your comment quoted above. I've given up with riding the twisties due to this fact and only "tour" with my FJR to/from work and "touring" on the weekends (freeways).But the FJR doesn't corner worth a damn, thanks to that fooked up throttle.
I have 20k on my FJR. I've had the PCIII for about 15k of that.
My 04 went from high 40s (46-49) to low 40s (40-43) or about a 15% drop. Well worth it. My FJR#2-also an 04, does not have the PCIII installed YET. It gets in the high 40s, sometimes low 50s but the damn surging is driving me nuts when I ride it which right now isn't much. It's also a lot hotter than FJR#1 so I am hoping the PCIII solves that too.You guys that installed a PCIII, how did it affect the fuel milage? I heard of cases where the milage went from the mid to high 40's to mid to high 30's.
Once in a while I jump on my old (2000) VFR (sold it to my brother) and am struck by how much more responsive and smooth the power delivery is than the FJR. Sure, in an all-out acceleration comparison, or any roll-on tests, the FJR will beat the VFR slightly, but when it comes to useful power, the advantage the FJR has is offset by the higher weight and the difference is negligible. Not to mention that the Vfour, with 92k miles, just feels 'tighter' and better put together than the FJR's buzziness. In case you can't tell... I still have a soft spot for Honda's engineering prowess. They have never let me down, whereas Yamaha has.The VFR was just managable because it has NO BALLS!!! I had one, I know.........
That's the problem - I can't think of another bike to replace the FJR with, either, unless I want to give up something. Anything bigger is out of the question .. anything smaller, and I give up the weather protection or ergo's. I've considered the Multistrada, but feel it is over priced (as are the roundel's offerings). Maybe a Dl1000 .. if I can get past the looks. I dunno what I would get instead.PCIII definitely will fix the abrupt throttle. If it still has more power than you are comfortable with at small turns of the throttle, add a G2 throttle tube. I was thnking today what I'd buy if I was in the market, and I can't think of a bike I'd rather have than the FJR.
The VFR is smooth like that. It feels like an extension of my body (full GP suspension didn't hurt either). The only time I can really relax on the FJR is when I'm out of the twisties.I came off a Triumph Sprint and it was so smooth that you forgot you were riding. This bike never lets you relax. It is almost hard to ride it. Makes it rough when unlike a car you can't test ride them first, well at most places.
That has worked for me on occasion (sometimes two gears lower), when I am in the mood to ride aggressively, hang off, etc. But when I am more relaxed, or riding around town, or when traction is compromised, etc. and not interested in racing through corners, I'm still spending way too much thought on feeding the power smoothly and avoiding unsettling the bike.Maybe its just a matter of riding style, but for what it's worth, here's my cheap (free) fix.
Go into the turn one gear lower than you currently enter them. This will cause you to be on the throttle as you enter and you avoid the lurch coming out. The other advantage of this is that you are generally in a higher RPM range when rolling back on the power, and therefore, you come shooting out of the corner much faster and more in control.
While this is a bit disconcerting at first, due to high engine noise, give it a try for a few miles of twisties. What have you got to lose except the 300 bucks for the PCIII. I'm not trying to downplay what others have said about the PCIII. Just offering a possible cost saving alternative.
I only have 2 fillups since installing the PCIII, but mileage has gone down. Please note that the bike computer shows my mileage going UP to about 42mpg from my usual 39mpg, when in fact the mileage has gone DOWN to about 36mpg. DON'T TRUST THE COMPUTER! Calculations must be done by hand!You guys that installed a PCIII, how did it affect the fuel milage? I heard of cases where the milage went from the mid to high 40's to mid to high 30's.
My '07 is perfect with the throttle spring release and the PCIII. With the PCIII and the new ECU I went from 43 mpg to 41. A small price to pay. My mpg readout still says 44-45, so don't trust it!No comments???You guys that installed a PCIII, how did it affect the fuel milage? I heard of cases where the milage went from the mid to high 40's to mid to high 30's.
The MPG is calculated on the fuel the FJR's MCU wanted to put into the cylinders, not what's actually put in by the PCIII, so the displayed MPG can't be relied on. On my stocker, it's optimistic anyway. Possibly because I spend so much time stationary, and I think it only calculates when moving (?)... With the PCIII and the new ECU I went from 43 mpg to 41. A small price to pay. My mpg readout still says 44-45, so don't trust it!
My readout was more accurate before I installed the PCIII, for sure. Maybe a bit optimistic. Now I don't even refer to it anymore. The replacement ECU seemed to affect the readout as well.The MPG is calculated on the fuel the FJR's MCU wanted to put into the cylinders, not what's actually put in by the PCIII, so the displayed MPG can't be relied on. On my stocker, it's optimistic anyway. Possibly because I spend so much time stationary, and I think it only calculates when moving (?)... With the PCIII and the new ECU I went from 43 mpg to 41. A small price to pay. My mpg readout still says 44-45, so don't trust it!
I agree - the fuel economy readout is no longer valid. Rule of thumb is that it is about 5mpg off now. My mileage has decreased about 10%. It was a good tradeoff, though.I only have 2 fillups since installing the PCIII, but mileage has gone down. Please note that the bike computer shows my mileage going UP to about 42mpg from my usual 39mpg, when in fact the mileage has gone DOWN to about 36mpg. DON'T TRUST THE COMPUTER! Calculations must be done by hand!You guys that installed a PCIII, how did it affect the fuel milage? I heard of cases where the milage went from the mid to high 40's to mid to high 30's.
Just put in a quart of pure white lightin' and your fjr will run like a rocket ship...
My gas mileage went from approx 48 to 52. I could get a higher mpg but I ain't ridin' my baby like a scooter.
Riiiiiight...and rear drive shafts shouldn't fail on bikes costing $6,000 MORE than the FJR.For the price of this bike we shouldn't have to do ANY thing to it to make it ridable. Just my thoughts.
I did it to fix the jerky throttle response issue. It did.While on the subject, are most doing the PCIII to fix issues or to make the bike run better over all. From other bikes I've owned and ran PC's on I don't see the bang for the buck unless you do some pretty decent engine mods, not just slip ons and intake mods.
Enter your email address to join: