Don,
I have a bonafide kool aid drinking buddy that owns a K1200 GT. He said the K1600 is heavier and does not put out significantly more power than the 1200. He said he will NOT be upgrading to the 1600 from the 1200. Can you enlighten me on the differences between the 1200 and 1600?
Ok, Squirrel, no offense to your friend, but he's crazy. Unless the GTL just weighs a LOT more than the GT or some other difference, the power delivery by the GT is incredible.
I took a white GT outfitted with Akropovic cans for a ride last Saturday, the day before Mother's day. Dean at Sandia BMW calle me and asked me if I wanted to ride it, so I rode my FJR down and took my daughter. I rode the GT and they did not have a GLT yet, so I don't have a comparison of that, so everything I say is related to the GT only.
It is a bigger bike than the FJR. No doubt...The dash board is higher, and the surrounding plastic encases the cockpit. There is no looking at the front forks from above the handle bars. The windshield is great and stops all the wind about 1/2 way up. The bike is no taller than the FJR, and feels very light. It moves around easily and I never worried about dropping it.
Once underway...Holy crap! The GT was so smooth, I could barely tell it was running. The clutch had this amazing feel to it that is hard to explain. The clutch didn't engage until it was almost fully out, but it was very fast and easy to hold. If I stopped and held the clutch, it took no grip like the FJR does. I could have done it all day.
Everything on that bike "clicks." The blinker switch has a solid click to its movement. Clicks on, clicks off. The shifter is the same way. It was a little hard to get used to, especially with the clutch engaging so late and being so light. Shifting was just a small movement and a click into gear. Trying to sync the gears to downshift may or may not have worked. It was just a click and the gear was changed. Up or down was the same. There was no gear grinding, no dog catching, and no long throw.
As I was leaving the parking lot, I hit the rear brake and got thrown forward. That thing is powerful, as were all the brakes. The bike can stop very well.
Once under power, any felt weight goes away. The GT felt as light as my FJR and was easliy as manuverable up to around 90. The power delivery is very linear and the thing just pulls like a train. I kept disengaging the clutch late because of where it engages, so at the upshifts, the bike would surge forward and then just keep pulling.
The bike was easy to manuver, and at 35mph in 5th gear, the bike pulled away without any issues. It makes 160 horses and 100 something lb/ft of torque. However around 90, the bike really wanted to go straight. Doing the little weave in the lane thing was hard to do at that speed. Not sure if its due to the weight, wheelbase, or a combination of things. Changing lanes and making turns was easy, but weaving the bike at that speed took more work. At slower speeds, it just fell whichever way I wanted it to go.
That bike with the pipes is priced at 25K. Holy Shit! That's a lot of money. However, this is the first bike I have ridden that I would replace my FJR with. I think when my time with the FJR is done, I may seriously consider the 1600GT. I just don't know if I want to spend nearly twice as much as it is not twice as much bike, but it is one Hellavua package. If it was between that and a GoldWing, I would definately take the GT, but price wise between the GT and the FJR, the FJR wins.
I absolutely love my FJR, but that GT was an amazing amazing bike. Smooth, fast and comfortable.