What I find interesting about the article is that it fails to mention the previously long-held practice of Microsoft (and most other legitimate software publishers for that matter) of under-pricing the boxed retail versions of its products in developing economies at price-points 40% - 60% below those of the developed economies of the US, EU, etc., in an effort to dis-incentivize piracy. One could surmise from this article that Microsoft has since given up on that practice as it has had apparently little impact on the rampant piracy in China (which is far from standing alone in the Asian piracy arena).
Having previously lived and worked in Asia for over 12 years, I'm quite certain that intellectual property piracy on the whole has little to do with politics, i.e., political will or a supposed lack thereof, and everything to do with traits of endemic cultures. I have a bit of a background in this and have fought the good fight for US business interests abroad - IPR issues were always a main event, so I speak with some knowledge of the subject. Governments, associations, NGOs, manufacturers and publishers on both sides of the fight will always bark because it's easier to bark at a single person or body than it is to bark at hundreds of millions (if not billions) of people. In other words, a finger must be pointed and someone must be blamed. But to politicize the issue completely misses the point.
[Note: I hope this wasn't too political, and agree that it has nothing to with motorcycles (though I'm sure that even Yamaha regularly contents with IPR issues in many, many countries.)]