sapest
Well-known member
4 & 7 mm see post 61
-Steve
-Steve
I am finding that the fronts outlast the rears by a fair margin. About two fronts to three rears. I would say that your front still has a way to go (but not an 8500 km trip). If you change your own tires, I would definitely keep it as a "take-off" for local riding or to finish out a season.Final comment for me.
At 9960 km, about 6190 miles, the front is about 2.5mm of tread. I am about to leave for a longish (8500km) trip, so I have to replace the frt now.
It looks like this -
So I am right in line with the other remarks about RSIII’s lasting about 85% of the life of PR4’s.
Onto PR5’s next.
-Steve
I am the opposite, the RSIII rear is about 4 mm of tread, and its going to take me to Ottawa. I expect to see a half worn, or less, front, and a worn out rear tire coming off.I am finding that the fronts outlast the rears by a fair margin. About two fronts to three rears. I would say that your front still has a way to go (but not an 8500 km trip). If you change your own tires, I would definitely keep it as a "take-off" for local riding or to finish out a season.
Nothing quite like starting out a trip on brand new tires. I will be interested in seeing how your Road 5's last (Michelin dropped the "Pilot" from the name). From what I have read, the "GT" version was originally supposed to be available in 2019 but I haven't heard anything more - no published release date. I will stick with the Roadsmart 3's until the GT version of the Road 5 is available. Michelin does not recommend the non-GT version for heavier ST bikes.
That is what I was saying - 2 fronts to 3 rear.I am the opposite, the RSIII rear is about 4 mm of tread, and its going to take me to Ottawa. I expect to see a half worn, or less, front, and a worn out rear tire coming off....
RossKean, if you want a half worn RSIII front, you can ride to Ottawa and pick it up after Sept 13. Let me know and I will ask the dealer to hold it for you...
-Steve
I misunderstood the comment where you said you expected to take off a worn out rear tire and a half used front. Guess this is the second front for that rear. I have to get through another couple of RS3 and if the Road5 GT is available, I will try them. Otherwise, I may experiment with a set of Shinko Ravens in the interim. So many tires, so little time..."I am finding that the fronts outlast the rears by a fair margin"
My experience with one set is the opposite, 2 frts (well 1.5) to one rr. Running at Manufacture's suggested pressure 39/41.
FWIW - my Parts Canada 'insider' says Road5GT will be available in Canada in Jan 2020.
We can all send our tread remaining takeoff's to the guy who re-soled his sandals from his tires.
-Steve
I've got a couple of thousand miles now on the RS3 and have run them in similar (less ideal conditions) as you mention and have been very pleasantly surprised with their performance and behavior. I've previously mostly run PR2, as well as a few sets of PR3, Angel GT, BT030, etc.That's interesting. I've had the exact opposite experience with my RS3s. I went on a 1700 mile trip with them, and we had several cold days in the high 30s-low 40's that included rain, sleet, and snow one day through twisty mountain passes. I never felt insecure with the RS3s. Tire pressure was 42 rear, 39 front, which is lower than I used on the Contis that I took off before the RS3. The Contis were a super grippy tire, and the RS3 feels just as good to me.
Agreed, their performance in wet is very good. Solid feel, and the same in dry. I wish they lasted longer . . . .I've got a couple of thousand miles now on the RS3 and have run them in similar (less ideal conditions) as you mention and have been very pleasantly surprised with their performance and behavior. I've previously mostly run PR2, as well as a few sets of PR3, Angel GT, BT030, etc.
In fact I'm so impressed with these tires already (especially considering their attractive price point) I've already purchased a second set of RS3 for my other set of rims.
I have a tall stack of take offs that I planned to use some day, but a new set of tires feels so good that I can never bring myself to reinstall a used tire. Now I have to figure out how to get rid of a stack of aged tires with half tread on them.That is what I was saying - 2 fronts to 3 rear.
Thanks for the offer. I always seem to end out with a few take-offs around because I change my own tires (often just before a trip) and can't bear to throw out something with useful life left. Re-installation cost isn't usually a factor - just my time. I use up some of them but more often decide to toss them after sitting in the basement a year or two.
Michelin does not recommend the non-GT version for heavier ST bikes.
I would normally agree on this - for the previous Michelins PR tires, GT was something that ONLY made a difference in handling or longevity running a heavily loaded bike. I looked on the Michelin website and Road5 is not a tire that is recommended for the FJR. I might not pay that much attention except for a couple of less-than-stellar reports from some individuals who have given them a try. One or two reviews does not necessarily condemn these tires but I will still wait for a better consensus on performance for the Road5 or the Road5 GT. Liked the PR2 rears but hated the fronts, really hated the PR3's, never tried the PR4 and will wait before trying the latest incarnation; especially at their price point..Yeah, whatever.
So much mental masturbation over the years when it comes to this subject! I've done both over the years and haven't really noticed a difference. Usually I spend most of my time one-up and not very loaded. However, this summer while in Europe I was two-up and heavily loaded to the max. Went through the Bridgestone T31s quick, and beggars can't be choosers...... Found a place that had a set of PR4s and had them installed. Non-GT. They performed admirably despite the weight under some very hard riding conditions. Ideally, I would have liked GT spec but not sure how they could have performed any better.....
Wow - what a difference. I ride a similar bike, but most of my riding is commuting with the occasional 1,000 mi weekend trip (2-up) plus lots of day trips in PNW. I am currently at 15,000 miles on my rear PR4 GT - and I expect several thousand more. A few weeks ago I rode to Boise and back. I looked at the tire before the trip and almost decided to replace it, but I decided that it would have another 1,000 mi left. I expected it to be at wear marks when I got home, but to my surprise I really couldn't see a difference! It seems to have stopped wearing - but I know that can't be true. This is by far the most I have ever gotten out of a rear tire. On my ST1300 I was used to 6-8k (Dunlop) and 8-10k (Angel GT), so I am amazed at these PR4. Needless to say, I have another pair ready to go in my garage. And the wear is extremely even - no scalloping, noise, or weird performance at all. My front PR4 lasted only 12,000 miles - first time I have seen a rear last longer than a front.The Road 5 GTs are suppose to be in distribution now although I haven't seen them on any sites selling the GT tires yet??
I've tried most of the popular brands of tires at this point except the Road Smarts. I've come to the conclusion that moving from one brand to another doesn't really help my tire life, or at least I'm not running in enough of a controlled condition to tell. For me it appears to do with how I ride and under what conditions. Most of my riding these days is loaded for a week or longer trip on "fun" roads. Not a lot of slabbing and zero commuting in the last couple of years. On my last trip I started with a brand new set of Bridgestone T31s. The rear tire last 9 days, 3,800 miles before I was on cords. At the same time I read messages here about people running the same tires and getting 8 to 12k on them??
When I used to commute on my bike I could get 6k'ish on a set but those days appear to be behind me....
Enter your email address to join: