Top_Speed1
Panama Canal Crosser
Yeahhhh buddy!, dem girlz love the fat meat!
This is exactly what causes this.<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Bounce" data-cid="1094485" data-time="1379172471"><p>Every review I've ever heard from mags and people I know, point out how larger rear tires (think cruisers and customs) make cornering turn in more sluggish. Has that been your experience? (late to the thread)</p></blockquote>
No, exactly the opposite. The 190/55 is taller, not wider.
I wouldn't describe handling as quicker or lighter necessarily,
but definitely more accurate or precise.
Steering response is wonderfully linear in both turn-in and
left-to-right transitions much like steering a car.
An added bonus is the ability to hold a line through a turn without
any pressure on the bars. I can actually let go of the bars
mid-turn without any drama.
I was originally is search of a longer lasting rear tire ( yet to be determined )
but to say I'm pleased with the results is an understatement.
After 1,000 miles on 190/55 PR3s, I agree with SLK50's analysis. Definitely cleaner on first turn-in, better in-corner stability, and bonus lack of peg-dragging two-up. Very happy I moved to the 190/55.
I've been thinking about this a lot, and I wonder if it isn't so much the shape or size of the tire, but more the fact that the added height raises the tail and thus effectively moves the C.G. forward? Sure feels like a different bike.
If you like.Maybe THAT'S why MissusHowie keeps nagging me to sell the ZRX? Screw her!!!!
I think the VRods have 240's. It's quite the fatty.There is the matter of the cost in horsepower. Back in my V-Rod days it was well established that going from a 180 to a 200 cost something in the neighborhood of 4 – 6 horsepower (same dyno, same day). That pesky rotating mass and all.
They have since 2008 when the "Muscle" model (gay-ass name if ever there were one) came out with the wider frame and swing arm. Prior to that they were 180's. And despite a 120 cc deficit, the older models are a hell of a lot faster.I think the VRods have 240's. It's quite the fatty.There is the matter of the cost in horsepower. Back in my V-Rod days it was well established that going from a 180 to a 200 cost something in the neighborhood of 4 – 6 horsepower (same dyno, same day). That pesky rotating mass and all.
Good luck....If you like.Maybe THAT'S why MissusHowie keeps nagging me to sell the ZRX? Screw her!!!!
I knew you would likey, but you may be wishing a bit too much on that 12-15K! Maybe on the low side of that "if" you do the commute thang and stay far away from canyonVERY glad I did this! Three hundred miles or so today and liked the change. Hopefully good to go for another 12-15K now!
Why?? A 205/50/17 fits the stock rim JUST fine!could send the wheel to Kosmann to be widened
It would fit, BUT, its not as big as you think! hmm? The "50" (aspect ratio) deflates (no pun intended) any gain by the 200.https://www.phatperformanceparts.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=MICHELIN-PWRPURE&CartID=
How about this fattie here: 200/50/17 ... Will this fit on the Feejer rear rim
First of all, don't waste your hard earned flames, I AM NOT A DARKSIDER, nor do I condone CT for bikes.Why?? A 205/50/17 fits the stock rim JUST fine!could send the wheel to Kosmann to be widened
I haven't taken the time to search out the thread(s), but I'm pretty sure Fairlaner and others here have done it without any issues (there may even be some in the earlier parts of this thread). I've got a 190/55 on order that I'm hoping to have installed this week. If there are any issues I'll let you know.Can any of the Gen III folks who have upsized the rear chime in here? Have you noticed any issues with ABS or TCS? I am a couple of weeks away from a new set of tires...I would like to move up to the 190/55s if there will be no ill effects on the electronics of the ABS or TCS on my '13.
Enter your email address to join: