I love the logic...
One guy pipes up that he thinks that his 2013 may have softer paint than his prior year bikes based on the number of rock chips he sees in the finish.
And the conclusions (based on a scientific sample size of 1) is that:
1) This is an unquestionably truth
2) Because his is a 2013, all 2013's must have softer paint
3) Since, 2013's are third gens...all third gens have soft paint
4) A bike with softer paint is not worth having regardless of any other attributes
See post #1 and post #39. That's two who seem to have some pretty strong imperial evidence. Don't worry though, as a Gen II owner, I can tell you the last thing anyone would ever do on this forum is talk **** about the new gen bike's, or try to constantly reinforce that the previous version is better. There's a big group of ODDS on here (one and three) that will surely be talking **** about my Gen IV when I replace mine with that, and the Gen V will come along and again be the kitty's *****'s.....