BrunDog
Well-known member
First of all: CUT THE CRAP WITH THE QUOTES!. You are making the thread hard to read and wasting bandwidth to boot.
I have sat on the bike a few times. At 6'0"", I think it is very comfortable, other than the legs being a little cramped.
In any event, I don't think it is unfair to compare it to the FJR. The ZX-14 and the Busa are NOT true sportbikes. They are GT sportbikes. They have long-ish wheelbases and long swingarms. They have less agressive steering geometry. They have low seats. What's different compared to the FJR? Screen, bars, and bags. All easily changed in either direction on either bike.
Sport touring bikes are not classified as such just because they have side cases. They are SPORT bikes that can go long distances. Nobody can define that. And nobody can decide for everybody what modifications need be done.
The ZX is more a SPORT touring bike than many other bikes that people do this kind of riding on. Almost as much as the FJR. Easily apples and apples comparison - just granny smith vs. golden delicious.
-BD
I have sat on the bike a few times. At 6'0"", I think it is very comfortable, other than the legs being a little cramped.
In any event, I don't think it is unfair to compare it to the FJR. The ZX-14 and the Busa are NOT true sportbikes. They are GT sportbikes. They have long-ish wheelbases and long swingarms. They have less agressive steering geometry. They have low seats. What's different compared to the FJR? Screen, bars, and bags. All easily changed in either direction on either bike.
Sport touring bikes are not classified as such just because they have side cases. They are SPORT bikes that can go long distances. Nobody can define that. And nobody can decide for everybody what modifications need be done.
The ZX is more a SPORT touring bike than many other bikes that people do this kind of riding on. Almost as much as the FJR. Easily apples and apples comparison - just granny smith vs. golden delicious.
-BD