I’d like to offer an opinion regarding the “generational” naming debate here. Since it’s not likely to be shared, give me a second to duck.
Claim: the 2016, even more than 2006 and 2013, deserves recognition as a new generation
Why? Except for choppers and some later Harleys, most manufacturers moved to unit construction back in the 1950s and 60s, so the transmission and clutch are more distinct functions than separate devices. Since the first European FJR in 2001, that “unit” has gone without any fundamental changes (insert: "unit" joke here). The 2016 design is the first elemental change to that core design. It must have been extremely costly in time and money to research, develop, test, and manufacture. And the new lighting, clocks, angle sensors, etc. are not insignificant either.
And given that Suzuki never entered the space, Honda seems to have left the building, and Kawasaki is in a holding pattern, Yamaha is really making a ballsy play with this change, particularly when so many are wondering if sport touring will survive at all. Go Yamaha.
It’s a Gen4.
[ducking]