mdisher
formerly Renegade, get used to it.
Pie is good too, but you can put Bacon on anything and make it betterI like Pie...I like Bacon.
Pie is good too, but you can put Bacon on anything and make it betterI like Pie...I like Bacon.
The stuff is MAGIC! If TWN, Iggy and Radman drink enough of it, they will be cured. As far as crashing your bike, your on your own. Even "Magic" can only do so much :lol: .Well sheeee-ut! That synthetic stuff of which you speak must be MAGIC! I wonder what else it can do? Can it cure TWN' predelection for Gerbils? Iggy's rudeness? :lol: Radman's warped wit? And most of all, will it keep my FJR from crashing no matter how I ride it?
It doesn't make Pie any better....Pie is good too, but you can put Bacon on anything and make it better
I dunno, I've seen some pie that could have benefited from a little bacon.It doesn't make Pie any better....Pie is good too, but you can put Bacon on anything and make it better
Well, yeah, but it would probably marginally improve the taste of a **** sandwich too... that's not saying much... seems like you need a better quality of pie... trust me... a quality pie is better sans bacon.... :lol:I dunno, I've seen some pie that could have benefited from a little bacon.It doesn't make Pie any better....Pie is good too, but you can put Bacon on anything and make it better
The temp drop was done on national TV using the rear axle, transfer case and transmissiom on a chevy 4x4 PU. It was there for the world to see. You should have seen it. I have also seen it personally in industry. It is true. I have seen it in "every" case, not just some, when you switch to a synthetic oil of the same spec. the machine, what ever it may be, "runs cooler".Spare me the claims of the synthetic marketiers..... If anyone has any data showing that synthetic lubricants "run cooler" I would love to see it.
I have personally done a fair amount of engine and vehicle cooling testing over the past few decades and have seen numerous comparisons of conventional vs. synthetic lubricants in rear axles (hypoid gears), transmissions (manaul and automatics) and engine oil. They run the same temperature within test repeatability. Period.
Synthetics are often spec'd in situations where the particular application might exceed the normal operating temperature of conventional lubricants. This leads to the belief that the synthetic was spec'd so that the unit would run cooler. Not the case. It is purely a preventative measure of the operating temperature with either lubricant to spec one that would withstand the temperature.
Tests run by synthetic marketiers that "prove" otherwise are very very suspect a done in that fashion to tempt you to buy their product. Like the Amsoil "4 ball wear test". Some of the better cutting fluids on the market (like TapEze and such) will also do very well on the "4 ball wear test." Think they would make good engine oil?
I have tested 100s always with the same results, lower temps. Did you do this test while they were under load?oh -- and BTW -- I actually did instrument 3 different gear boxes, and the operating temperature was the same regardless of the oil type (same weight used).
yes. under load. 2 weeks regular oil, 2 weeks synthetic. no diff in temp.I have tested 100s always with the same results, lower temps. Did you do this test while they were under load?oh -- and BTW -- I actually did instrument 3 different gear boxes, and the operating temperature was the same regardless of the oil type (same weight used).
In summary... it's the people that are spending their time replying to "best oil" threads, rather than taking the time to change their oil as scheduled, that have something to be concerned about.
Hmmmm.... new term, "Typosyntheticlubritosis" - the failure of all premium grade lubricants induced by ignoring scheduled oil changes in order to spend more time on NEPRT responses.
:grin: :help: :laughingsmiley:
I worked for a Chevron refinery for over 35yrs. I was the head instrument teck and Forman of the electrical dept. I didn't actually pour the oil in the machinery but I did install the Instrumentation for monitoring it. Temperature is one of the parameters we monitored.Show me examples of where the industry is "switching over" to synthetics and explain to me why, specifically. I doubt you know.The temp drop was done on national TV using the rear axle, transfer case and transmissiom on a chevy 4x4 PU. It was there for the world to see. You should have seen it. I have also seen it personally in industry. It is true. I have seen it in "every" case, not just some, when you switch to a synthetic oil of the same spec. the machine, what ever it may be, "runs cooler".
There are a lot of oils that do well in the "4 ball wear test" that would not make a good motor oil but wouldn't you think that this would also be a good thing in "motor oil.
Wake up dude. The rest of the world knows synthetic oils are better. Industry is switching over to it. The auto industry is switching over to it and even the motorcycle industry is switching over to synthetic. How come you can't see it.
Quadruple distilled Vodka with a 50/50 mix of OJ and regular tonic. Makes me run cooler. The 5 times distilled Vodka is just unnecessary and a waste of money! However the triple distilled stuff is cheaper so it can't be better so I stay away from that etc.etc. :yahoo:I'm gonna start a poll entitled: What do you drink while posting?
Snicker.
:lol:
That's especially noticable on dirt bikes with a typical oil system capacity of 1.5 liters or so. My shifting goes to hell in a couple of hours with anything but my favorite synthetic oil on my dirt machines. Consistency is my big rub with dino oil. It's been well established even on this forum that gasoline quality can vary wildly and there are a lot more people watching for bad gas than there are watching for motor oil quality. And even with all those people watching, I've screwed up more than my share of gas at the refinery and seen it get sold. Anybody who thinks the same thing doesn't happen with motor oil (only worse) is fooling themselves. Dino oil base stocks vary like crazy. A recipie that works with one run won't even come close on the next and believe me when I say oil companies only spend so much time and effort on a given batch of motor oil. Industrial oils are different. End users do oil analysis, the oil companies know this, and you can bet it's going to be in spec when it goes out the door which is why it's more expensive. Not so with motor oils. If an off spec batch of motor oil gets bottled up and sold to some cut rate outfit like say, Walmart, who's gonna know? I'll tell you who, nobody that's who and it happens all the time. Synthetic base stocks are exactly the same every time, that's the whole point. The same recipie for a given blend will nail the spec every time. It boils down to you get what you pay for.Well, for me it has been simple. Back in the day when I had my old trusty CBR1000F I used to run dyno. This bike had a lot of miles on the odo, so the tolerances had probably been stretched a bit. After a oil change with dyno oil, it would take about a 1000 miles for the engine to start making little mechanical noise it didn't make with fresh oil.
Now this bike used oil to, so at that time it was also about nessessary to add a ¼ liter of oil. After adding the oil, the engine was quiet again. About 500 miles later it would start making noises again.
I switched that bike to full synth, same viscosity. Never heard noises from the engine again between 6,000 miles oil changes. Of course it still needed a little oil now and then.
To me, it is pretty clear that dyno oil will be sheared to bits within 1000 miles if it is running in a gearbox like most motorcycles. This has also been proven on various reputable websites over the years. Unless you want to change your oil every 1000 miles, do not use dyno. It is crap. Dyno does not like gearboxes.
Now if you ride a beemer for instance, which has a seperate gearbox with its own oil like a car, you may get away with it. There is much less shearing then.
Enter your email address to join: