airboss
Well-known member
Well JB, I think it very considerate of you to leave, before the snoring disturbed the lecture.
Nothing is more debilitating than some pompous professor trying to entertain. They become so indulged in self-importance, they forget they have an audience. I'll never forget when my daughter graduated from St. Norbert's and the speaker was the head of the Library of Congress. He was a total bore. People were laughing at him. We would have enjoyed a lecture of exploits by a street whore rather than listen to his hollow ramblings.
I saw that that was on but opted not to watch it. If I’d had your comment earlier I’d have watched it. But I’ll look for the replay.Sounds like the lecture was the polar opposite of Neil deGrasse Tyson's NOVA show last night, The Pluto Files. The way he can teach and draw interest to his topic is amazing. I'm sure if we had more high school science teachers like him we'd have many, many more students interested in the sciences. And I'd be willing to bet he showers every day.
:blink: dunno but try this .....What is LHC?
You forgot modest. I'd say you're a bit wordy, but there's that pot/kettle thing.So I take it “quite full of himself” means educated, erudite, reflective, thoughtful, alive, engaged, thinking, and of course handsome.
The title of this post got my attention. I made it half-way through the second paragraph before I realized your post was actually 13 or 14 paragraphs long. About that time, I concluded that you are quite full of yourself. Then I remembered one other of your posts that left me with the same impression. Kudos to anyone who actually managed to finish the read You must have ample time on your hands and the patience of Job.
I see you’re a long-timer BJ so I expect to get some flack from any lingering groupies you may have. Peace.
If I understand correctly, according to your metric, anyone who writes anything more than one paragraph is “quite full of himself.” Well, then I’m in good company, including Tolstoy, Kierkegaard, Marx, Plato, T.S. Eliot, every journalist on the planet, and my children, just to name a few. So I take it “quite full of himself” means educated, erudite, reflective, thoughtful, alive, engaged, thinking, and of course handsome.
I’ve always felt that a mind is a terrible thing to waste. But for those who have weak minds, I can recommend Sesame Street. It’s on TV, so you don’t have to read anything at all, or even think. You can just watch the images dance on the screen in front of you, kinda like my cat. My cat has a lot of time on its hands. I don’t. So I read and write, among other things.
It also appears that anyone who can read more than one and a half paragraphs receives your praise. I can imagine such praise would be highly sought.
Very well spoken, wheatonFJR; Thank You!Some people have no humor...but instead exist to make critical comments of others. It's easier to tear down than to build up. It's a sad way to live.
BTW - too long, didn't read.No, you misunderstand. Allow me to clear this up for you, humor aside. I find your self-serving rhetoric boring and obtuse. My guess is that many on the forum do as well, save a few weak-minded proselytes who have chimed in with insolent and turgid remarks I think it's arrogant, really, to attempt to manipulate opinions of others with impertinent proclamations of academic achievement rather than with substance and sincerity. In any case, I don't judge others by the degrees they may or may not have and, unlike you, I refrain from making crass remarks about another's perceived lack of education. My commentary was not mean-spirited nor was it camouflaged; it was just my personal observation. Well, I've enjoyed this senseless and unproductive banter with you and your apostles but I think I'll leave it there....in one paragraph.
Enter your email address to join: