johnny80s
Turtle Gears
They need to make this right.
I agree .....First issue I've ever heard of with Russell.They contend the pics we sent with the order did not have the saddlebags on and they are not going to fix it. I contend every pic they show on their website shows the FJR with bags on it and they should know whether a bike has stock bags or not.
Curious why you sent them pictures to begin with. If you sent pictures why didn't you include side bags as you run it? That seat looks particularly custom--especially with the passenger seat.
Something just doesn't seem to add up here..... :glare:
Me guesses this is the issue.......... or is the body size of the passenger requiring a larger seat?
Couldn't have said that any better myself! I see nothing wrong with the seat, lets see the pics you sent to Russel.Here is what I foresee happening: You'll whine and ***** to Russel directly and through public forums -and they'll agree to modify the seat. Weeks later your modified seat won't be as good as the first one .....but thank god you can open your luggage without having to use your pinky finger to push the seat away a millimeter or two.
How about a picture of your wife on the new seat ....and that's see how bad of a job Russel did fitting that seat to her ***. Did you buy the seat for her or the luggage?
To be fair to Russell, maybe you should post the photos of your wife sitting on the bike.
I looked for a photo of my bike showing the passenger seat and side bags, but this is the only one I could find:
I gotta agree. Unless Russell had a chat with them and specifically indicated that the seat may interfere, they should make it right. I am in the market for a seat right now and looking at lots of options. I was really liking the Russell for a new seat before this. I will see how it pans out, but unless there is some background we are missing (ant there may be) they should make it right.What is wrong with this bunch, Russell should have never made A seat that interferes with the bags!! I dont see how there are two sides to this I would not be happy with it either!! As far as the pictures go who gives A DAMN Russell should no better!!!
Good on ya, Pop, to adopt this position. B)Thank you everyone for your input/opinion, even those that disagree. I always want to see both sides of an issue and this is a good source for that.
What is wrong with this bunch, Russell should have never made A seat that interferes with the bags!! I dont see how there are two sides to this I would not be happy with it either!! As far as the pictures go who gives A DAMN Russell should no better!!!
Nothing wrong here, actually quite civil to this point... Wait till fridayWhat is wrong with this bunch
I also agree. This is a cut and dry issue. Russell should know better as they have made hundreds of seats for the FJR and as stated, unless they warned of possible interference with the bags this should be 100% on them to fix.I gotta agree. Unless Russell had a chat with them and specifically indicated that the seat may interfere, they should make it right. I am in the market for a seat right now and looking at lots of options. I was really liking the Russell for a new seat before this. I will see how it pans out, but unless there is some background we are missing (ant there may be) they should make it right.What is wrong with this bunch, Russell should have never made A seat that interferes with the bags!! I dont see how there are two sides to this I would not be happy with it either!! As far as the pictures go who gives A DAMN Russell should no better!!!
If it was my business i would probably do it to avoid this exact situation.
Enter your email address to join: