marcusorelius
Well-known member
Now that sounds like your "ultimate" answer!
whoever "owns" the bike is responsible to have insurance to cover any liabilityIn a different take on this story, what would you being doing now if you had completed the purchase and the get off had occurred on the way home? I’ve dropped my 05 several times and it still is a great bike. Parts can be replaced and it’s still a FJR.
As I've admitted, I don't know the facts, but I do have a question about your answer. In the case of a rental car, what you are saying is not true. The driver is responsible. I realize loaning a bike may be different, but then again, so could test riding one be. Again, I'm not saying I know the answer, but the waiver he signed sounds like a legal document to me - just like a rental car agreement.whoever "owns" the bike is responsible to have insurance to cover any liabilityIn a different take on this story, what would you being doing now if you had completed the purchase and the get off had occurred on the way home? I’ve dropped my 05 several times and it still is a great bike. Parts can be replaced and it’s still a FJR.
if you loan your fjr to a friend and he gets in a accident, YOUR insurance is what covers; you are the owner of the vehicle in question
here's an example of a dealership insurance company that ruled that they do not cover damage and injury to folks test driving a dealer's automobile and getting in an accident with injury. They were sued and lost. Even though there was a signed waiver, they were responsible for covering the damage/injury.As I've admitted, I don't know the facts, but I do have a question about your answer. In the case of a rental car, what you are saying is not true. The driver is responsible. I realize loaning a bike may be different, but then again, so could test riding one be. Again, I'm not saying I know the answer, but the waiver he signed sounds like a legal document to me - just like a rental car agreement.whoever "owns" the bike is responsible to have insurance to cover any liabilityIn a different take on this story, what would you being doing now if you had completed the purchase and the get off had occurred on the way home? I’ve dropped my 05 several times and it still is a great bike. Parts can be replaced and it’s still a FJR.
if you loan your fjr to a friend and he gets in a accident, YOUR insurance is what covers; you are the owner of the vehicle in question
My point was in rebuttal to some of the comments about "buying damaged bike". If he had completed the purchase and dropped the bike on the way home he would be in a different frame of mind because he would now own new bike that was had been damaged and he would be dealing with it from a entirely different direction. The Insurance and liablity has nothing to do with the point I was making. I still think the dealer is trying to hose him.whoever "owns" the bike is responsible to have insurance to cover any liabilityIn a different take on this story, what would you being doing now if you had completed the purchase and the get off had occurred on the way home? I’ve dropped my 05 several times and it still is a great bike. Parts can be replaced and it’s still a FJR.
if you loan your fjr to a friend and he gets in a accident, YOUR insurance is what covers; you are the owner of the vehicle in question
whoever "owns" the bike is responsible to have insurance to cover any liabilityif you loan your fjr to a friend and he gets in a accident, YOUR insurance is what covers; you are the owner of the vehicle in question
TW, didn't you hurt your back (or, your neck), too...?<snippage>...Thoughts:4. ... And I go back to my prior comment that there is not enough meat on this bone to get an attorney fired up about this for the "long haul" battle.
FAIR is a place where the biggest pig wins the prize... :blink:6. Go back to the dealership and work out a compromise that is FAIR to both parties.
-I will agree. I've had dealers refuse a test ride, stating that it would be an insurance risk. It's also hard to believe a waiver would make a difference. I think theat dealer is being a jerk.There is no way on God's green Earth that a test rider is liable for anything. It's the dealer's risk to allow test rides, which is why nobody does them.
If his insurance doesn't allow test rides, too bad. It's still his risk. Consult an attorney. It's cheaper than the bike repair.
Good post. But to your comment above, don't forget that if the OP doesn't buy the bike, the dealer is stuck with a bike that is still being sold as a new bike, but now they have to disclose that its been wrecked. So even if the bike is rebuilt to look exactly like a new bike, it is very likely that they will not be able to sell it for as much money as they would have had it not been wrecked (would you buy a new bike from a dealer that had $4,000 damage to it?).l.....There is no reason in the world that the dealer should be allowed to unjustly profit off of your unfortunate mishap. They are entitled to fair market value for the bike. Nothing more - nothing less...
Enter your email address to join: