Wee Willy
It's bad, you know
+1. And another Californication opinion. You will be (and should be) responsible for the extent of the loss to the dealership. The real question is what is the loss? What insurance does the house carry? Ask the dealer. And do you have any riding insurance? You should be out the deductible at worst if either of these conditions apply.Tailwalker - Ironic handle wouldn't you say… I know it can be about airpalnes too, but….
I totally disagree with many things said here.
I'm not sure what the WA state laws are there, so I'll use my Cali logic (Like that's good anywhere else). The person riding the bike IS responsible for damage. Yes the bike should be insured thru the dealer or the dealer assumes risk if not. That being said, who caused the accident? The rider. Who is legally responsible under the law to pay? Technically the rider is. Insurance is for taking that burden from the rider and being underwritten for such a mishap.
If the dealer so wishes I'm sure he can take legal action against you and more then likely prevail, maybe not. Maybe the laws in WA state say, you let the person ride it, it's your fault.
You may want to talk to an attorney friend if available.
Good luck.
Did you like the bike? Does it fit in your wallet? Buy it with the fixes, get the 2-year coverage and move out. You're getting a great machine with only cosmetic damage fixed up by the dealer (5 mph...right?).
And finally, "just walking away" is unethical... You wouldn't like it if the roles were reversed. Tally up your real losses (after any insurance), face 'em down and deal with 'em. Any decent attorney can help you find the real answer to the loss question.
Good luck.
W2
Last edited by a moderator: