The rider apparently scored Blaine, is apparently heading for Madawaska, and has scarfed up up several capitals along the way.... and the rider should be in Cheektowaga early enough to get well rested before the beginning of Leg 2.
Interesting route. My problem with it is that the rider skipped a lot of capitals and a lot of points. Assuming he pulls off Madawaska, it will be interesting to see what points are available on legs 2 and 3 to make up for it. This route was one of my original plans, but I keep waffling. I'm not so sure this is best anymore. I need to see point values. In fact, I think there is a good chance I would have gone to Hyder, for better, or for worse.
I call this IBR the 'Gamble' rally. One way or another, if you want a podium finish you have to make a gamble based on what little you 'know' you have to do, what you 'know' is available, and what you 'don't know' might be coming.
Hyder is a gamble - great knock-out punch points on the first leg but at what cost? Does going there mean not getting many states that you are going to have to waste time obtaining on leg 3? Making it all but impossible to also obtain the 4-corners? And *possibly* high point capitals?. And at what cost to your overall level of fatigue?
4-corners is a gamble - Is it worth eating up the time to get those corners when that time may well be better spent on those yet unkown capital points on legs 2 and especially 3?
And of course the final gamble - that capital points will escalate in leg 2 and especially leg 3 making the 4800 points for Hyder and 4-corners not such a huge advantage.
Tough rally. In most past rallys, what you have to do for each leg is straight forward. It may not be simple, but you just need to worry about maximizing points for that leg. Not this one. You have all kinds of crazy scenarios to consider. Wish I would have been at that rider's meeting to see if any clues were given by rally staff. Also would really like to see Leg 1 points values. If you scarf up most of the high point capitals, how many points would that give you? 2000? 3000? 4000? 5000? More? What I would expect to accumulate on leg 1 and the assumption they are only going to get bigger in successive legs would really play into my decision making process for which 'gamble' I would take.
Right now I can't decide between the two I would most likely have taken, which is better - taking the risky Hyder destination and scarf up capitals on legs two and three? Or just go capital hunting on all legs?
I think they key to Hyder is getting Oregon, and many other states. If you leave a bunch for leg 3, you're screwed. Leaving too many states to get on leg 3 would kill you in getting the high point capitals. I am gambling that those 4800 Hyder points would quickly fade when all you are doing is trying to get states and not the high point capitals. If any of the current 3 make Buffalo, it will be VERY interesting to me what states they did and did not get. If possible, getting a few of the high point capitals on leg 1 would also be a very good insurance policy.
The other thing that is very different about this rally is the length of the legs. Leg 1 is the longest which is unusual. (104 hours leg 1 vs. 87 hours leg 3) Typically, a rider scores a LOT more points in leg 3 due to point values
and because it is a longer leg. For example, in '09 I scored 15k points in leg 1 of 3, and a HUGE 71k points in leg 3 of 3. In '07 it was 90k points on leg 1/2, and a whopping 208k points on leg 2/2. With those kinds of differentials, a strategy of going all out on leg 1 doesn't make sense. You save yourself for the last leg - the 'make or break' leg.
Still, that in this rally the first leg is the longest has me befuddled a bit. Then toss in the Hyder and 4-corners bait.
My gut still says leg 3 will be 'make or break' and while Hyder and 4-corners may have an impact, they will not be as important as most think at this time. But that is *my gamble*. And a gamble it is.
I would most likely have scored Blaine, just in case the leg 2 rally packet would lead me to believe 4-corners was a viable option still on the table, but would assume after that leg 2 rally packet was out was analyzed I would abandon the 4-corners quest.
Hyder - that is a tougher decision. Great risk and reward. I think my decision would be the differential in points on leg 1 between getting it (and Oregon), and just scarfing capitals.
I really wish I was running it, but to me, this one is really tough to plan in the beginning when trying to go for that Top 10, or Top 5 finish. It will be VERY interesting to me to see what two top competitors have done - Eric Jewell and Chris Sakala. We still don't know a damn thing about them yet.