Why would anyone be shifting, AE or standard, in tight spaces at slow speeds?Outside of a disadvantage in tight spaces at slow speeds, I just can't find anything wrong with the AE.
Yep...55 times a minute!Can't beat those quick downshifts before the corner or upshifts coming out of it.
THE 2006 AE IS THE GREATEST MOTORCYCLE IN THE VISIBLE UNIVERSE
Thank You
V
I completely agree! Gunny!+1 You got that right. Its completely unfair to have anybody jump on a AE and be allowed to review it.
Not feeling defensive at all. Just speaking from experience. Can you say the same thing?Dude, you're just fixated on the AE/standard thing, ain't ya? Feelin' defensive?
Actually, what I think has been holding back true automatic transmissions in motorcycles is the size of the packaging and the efficiency of the tranny itself. As technology makes autos for bikes that actually work you will see more and more of them built. Oh, in case you weren't aware, the AE isn't an automatic transmission its an auto clutch, but you knew that right?The AE is for you. Awesome. Glad ya like it. But you are, among motorcycle riders, in the minority. Car drivers? Yep, here in the States they love their automatics. Hard to shift when you've got your Starbucks in one hand and the cell phone in the other. But motorcyclists on the whole have failed to make autos a long-term proposition. There have been a few now & then, but my bet is that it remains a very small segment of the market. If they were of interest, there'd be lots of 'em out there.
This has to be some of the most intelligent words ever spoken on this forum. Yeah, I think I'll move to where there is no traffic. That seems like a viable option. I guess the Times Square Hooker Statement is from from experience because you obviously have never ridden a motorcycle with an automatic or an auto clutch (that would be the AE FJR, but you knew that, right?).Traffic don't matter if you're a standard trans aficionado. If it does to you, well, don't live where there is traffic or get an automatic. No skin off my nose. Short of becoming a paraplegic, I ain't gonna be drivin' no automatics. They suck harder than a Times Square hooker wantin' to go home.
I think the issue has more to do with there being no manual clutch than it does with trying to shift at low speeds.Why would anyone be shifting, AE or standard, in tight spaces at slow speeds?
It is not the fact you are shifting up and down in the parking lot, it is the lack of "FINE CONTROL" you have when you can slip the clutch with your left hand to crawl forward at very, very slow pace..Why would anyone be shifting, AE or standard, in tight spaces at slow speeds?Outside of a disadvantage in tight spaces at slow speeds, I just can't find anything wrong with the AE.
Yep...55 times a minute!Can't beat those quick downshifts before the corner or upshifts coming out of it.
You mean like the FINE CONTROL you have with judicious applications of throttle?It is not the fact you are shifting up and down in the parking lot, it is the lack of "FINE CONTROL" you have when you can slip the clutch with your left hand to crawl forward at very, very slow pace..Why would anyone be shifting, AE or standard, in tight spaces at slow speeds?Outside of a disadvantage in tight spaces at slow speeds, I just can't find anything wrong with the AE.
Yep...55 times a minute!Can't beat those quick downshifts before the corner or upshifts coming out of it.
Some people learn from experience. Others can learn from the experience of others. I’m not sayin’ anything, I’m just sayin….Not feeling defensive at all. Just speaking from experience. Can you say the same thing?Dude, you're just fixated on the AE/standard thing, ain't ya? Feelin' defensive?
I’m rounding. Automatic is automatic to my eyes, whether we’re talking just the clutch or a fully automatic transmission. But yes I knew & thank you for your sarcasm. I can see a full automatic succeeding in the USA. Why not? Most drivers are pretty detached from their surroundings and thus another way to get more detached riders on the road would probably play well.Actually, what I think what has been holding back true automatic transmissions in motorcycles is the size of the packaging and the efficiency of the tranny itself. As technology makes autos for bikes that actually work you will see more and more of them built. Oh, in case you weren't aware, the AE isn't an automatic transmission its an auto clutch, but you knew that right?
Hey, you’re the one bitching about riding in traffic and how your limp left wrist can’t handle pulling in the clutch to shift, not me. My give-a-**** meter is sitting on zero when asked about where you choose to live.This has to be some of the most intelligent words ever spoken on this forum. Yeah, I think I'll move to where there is no traffic. That seems like a viable option.
I haven’t ridden on a hooker or an AE FJR. I have driven an automatic and I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. It’s not for me—the AE, that is. I don’t have to drive an AE to know that I don’t want the computer figuring out the clutch modulation for me.I guess the Times Square Hooker Statement is from from (sic) experience because you obviously have never ridden a motorcycle with an automatic or an auto clutch (that would be the AE FJR, but you knew that, right?).
Opinions are like ******** . . . . . everybody's got one.
Luckily, no one cares what the british think.................
KM
Every publication that has reviewed the AE has hated the tranny/cluch and downgraded the FJR accordingly. The AE been a real drag on the bike's reputation, at least in the press.
Frankly, I trust the reviews I get in the U.K. mags like Bike, Ride, and TWO more than any of the USA mags aside from Motorcycle Consumer News. The British and U.K. rider-writers state just what they think and will trash bikes they don't like, even if that brand advertises in the magazine.Fixed it for you.Luckily, no one in the USA cares what the British think.................KM
Enter your email address to join: