keithaba
Well-known member
I prefer to have a damn good time, even when I crash!
There, modified to fit our forum better!
I prefer to have a damn good time, even when I crash!
You might add on a motorcycle to the end of that. If I remember correctly and can recount some stories passed on this board, a few "crashed" while walking in Park City.I prefer to have a damn good time, even when I crash!
There, modified to fit our forum better!
I tend to think that all other factors (riding style, where one rides, etc) being equal, the odds of a second accident are the same as the first accident since they would be independent events.Considering the high degree of probability of having some kind of an accident, how much does already having had one (or more) reduce one's chances?
Seems to me that every time we go out we roll the dice. If you're paying attention and they're paying attention, then the odds are really good that you'll be fine. If only one of those holds true, then the odds ain't so good. If neither is true, then it's looking pretty bad (e.g., not "if," but "when").I don't think that it's inevitable, but I don't think it's entirely preventable either. I do all that I can reasonably do to avoid a wreck (MSF training, constant reading, practice on a closed course, etc) and make every effort to mitigate risk of damage to my body (armored gear, gloves, helmet, boots, etc) but none of that can guarantee that some blue-hair won't sneak up and plow me.What do you guys think? Is it just a matter of time before each of us gets our clock cleaned?
Inquiring minds want to know.
I try to have the mindset that it's always probable...and pay attention accordingly.
.02
Tim getting in an accident reduced the chances of me getting in another one.I used to think not before I crashed. Now, I think otherwise for some strange reason...
Playing devils advocate here, and I know I will probably take some flaming for this whole line of thought, :diablo: but this example works pretty well since your crashes are neither motorcycle related nor would I be questioning your or her riding / driving ability.My wife has been hit 3 times in the past 3 years. In each case she was completely stopped in traffic and someone plowed into her from behind. I was in the car as a passenger in 2 of those cases. There's simply going to be those unavoidable instances.
Annual percentage wise, I believe I read bike accidents are in the increase. Not surprising considering more and more people having more expendable income equating to more people buying bikes which continuously become more powerful, and the technology of speed out-pacing rider skill levels. Plus of course the ever increasing stat... more and more vehicles per square mile.
Two thoughts to add:
Considering the high degree of probability of having some kind of an accident, how much does already having had one (or more) reduce one's chances?
One could argue that your odds will now be reduced because you've already "paid your dues" so to speak. But another might say you were obviously taking certain risks that led to the circumstance of the collision. Or maybe you'll have modified your actions after falling and no longer take those same risks. Things that make yo go, Hmmm...
Also, it is my thought (I have no proof at all) that where you ride (and when) has a tremendous influence on your odds.
Correct. However, in my case, it is now impossible to be inevitable as it has already happened. As for shooting flaming holes, I should think that including your personal habits in a discussion such as this might have been better left unwritten.I still can't believe how many of you are convinced that it's inevitable. Understanding that the meaning of inevitable is that it will absolutely happen no matter what, I find it difficult to buy into. I am willing to bet that there are life-long riders out there somewhere that have NEVER wrecked. If there is even one person who rode their entire life without crashing then it shoots a big flaming hole in the "it's inevitable" theory.
Malve has it right. "My boy is wicked smaht!"Some people who have already crashed are less likely to in the future based on their "crash education" and increased respect for riding. Some are more likely to crash because they are "proven" crashers who on a previous occasion lacked the skill set to avoid the accident (regardless of the circumstances...don't argue). Some are equaly likely and the difference between the three are completely subjective and near impossible to figure.The odds of crashing ten times in the future are very low...however if you crash nine times, you are no less likely to crash again based on your past. Just like the coin that is unlikely to land heads 10 times in a row yet after 9 heads in a row, still has a 50/50 chance on the next toss.
People with diseases with very high mortatlity rates sometimes live and people sometimes die from breast surgery and the like. Statistics are funny that way but one thing ids for certain... 90% of everything is half mental. All kidding aside, on top of all of the safe riding choices that you can make, I think that people like dcarver have recently demonstrated that if you are commited to not crashing even when faced with obstacles (literally) that would send most down you decrease the odds considerably. How many crashes (especially single rider ones) do you think could have been avoided if the rider simply commited themselves to "riding the bike".... I believe many.
Anyway, I'm sure there are no forum members here that don't respect the risk factor but I think that the only way you could say that a crash is inevitable is if you rode for an infinite amount of time because in a limited window of time anything is possible.
Enter your email address to join: