TownsendsFJR1300
Well-known member
Something not mentioned, if it was a new bike, the tires are also new, thus NOT scrubbed in and are slicker than a "broke in tire"..
Scott
Scott
Naaaah, you'll be back to look again.Not that I expect many folks to care, but this is the last time I'm looking at this thread. Why? I'm getting nauseated by the number of people who think you can sign a contract but then not live up to what you signed. You think you can wreck someone elses bike and take ZERO responsibility for it. You think think the dealer is a crook because he want's to not lose money on your mistake. And you think they should magically be able to "qualify" your riding ability even though you have already produced a drivers license with a MC endorsement (that's what I've always had to do) and you tell them you currently own a bike.
Don't get me wrong, I think its ok for the OP to do some homework, and the dealer should be reasonable - but the OP has stated repeatedly that he thinks they are trying to work with him and be reasonable. But it's the tone of "hey, it's the dealers fault I wrecked their bike, and even though they have a deductible to cover and even though I signed a waiver saying I know I'm responsible if I wreck it, screw them - they should eat the damages".
Some good points here and like others have said in this case, a lawyer should be consulted and they need to understand every datail of the events.Naaaah, you'll be back to look again.Not that I expect many folks to care, but this is the last time I'm looking at this thread. Why? I'm getting nauseated by the number of people who think you can sign a contract but then not live up to what you signed. You think you can wreck someone elses bike and take ZERO responsibility for it. You think think the dealer is a crook because he want's to not lose money on your mistake. And you think they should magically be able to "qualify" your riding ability even though you have already produced a drivers license with a MC endorsement (that's what I've always had to do) and you tell them you currently own a bike.
Don't get me wrong, I think its ok for the OP to do some homework, and the dealer should be reasonable - but the OP has stated repeatedly that he thinks they are trying to work with him and be reasonable. But it's the tone of "hey, it's the dealers fault I wrecked their bike, and even though they have a deductible to cover and even though I signed a waiver saying I know I'm responsible if I wreck it, screw them - they should eat the damages".
O.K. let me get this straight. If you were selling your feejr and some 20 year old showed up on his Yamaha TTR250 and wanted to test ride, you would say. "Sure go ahead, hears the Keys" Just sign this release. How in anyones right mind do you think that that's ethical.
Contract or no Contract the dealer has some responsibility. Now take this one step further and God forbid but what if TW had got run over and seriously hurt in this situation. Any jury would side against this dealer for negligence of not properly instructing the rider on the inherent dangers of this motorcycle compared to what he rode in on. This dealer would be out of business.
TW is one stand up guy and trying to take some responsibility for his actions and can be applauded. "BUT"
My problem is with the dealer. He has done everything wrong here.
1) He should have never let him test ride an AE version of this bike.
2) Failed to give any instructions on how to operate the FJR1300AE
3) Failed to warn about the horsepower and cold tires not being scrubbed in.
4) Forced him to charge 4K on his credit card and not get anything in return
5) Overcharging for repairs
6) Overcharging him for the actual value of the bike
7) Not divulging that this is an auction bike (technical used) without warranty.
TW is just being taken advantage of in this instance and though the dealer may be acting real nice and all he is screwing him over while being nice too. The lowest of the low in my opinion.
Cool: if I invite you over for a beer and you spill some on the carpet, man up and buy me a new carpet, couch and plasma TV--I shouldn't have to "lose money on your mistake".Not that I expect many folks to care, but this is the last time I'm looking at this thread. Why? I'm getting nauseated by the number of people who think you can sign a contract but then not live up to what you signed. You think you can wreck someone elses bike and take ZERO responsibility for it. You think think the dealer is a crook because he want's to not lose money on your mistake.
My dealer on my AE test ride gave me some instruction on using the electronic clutch. I hope yours did. Having said that, it still was not enough instruction to understand what happens when the revs drop low. That took a few hundred miles to understand. I think that sliderule has a point that your eclutch may have disengaged and then trying to get on the trottle the revs went too high before the clutch reengaged.At 5 mph the rpms could very well have been low enough that the clutch disengaged and twisting the of throttle may have reengaged the clutch much like popping the lever would do. This would have resulted in a burst rather than a hard roll-on. The power this bike contains can easily get away from you, ask me how I know, especially with inexperience with the e-clutch. You can learn to control the clutch and keep it engaged. They are known for getting the better of a rider used to having a lever.
Hey guys,
Thanks so much for your input on this. To clarify some things; I did sign a waiver that specifically excluded them from liability for injuries to me or anyone else and I also remember reading something about me being responsible for repairs to the motorcycle. After we went over the damage report and he told me how much he wanted for the motorcycle I told him I couldn't make a decision about it right away. He said that was fine with him but that he'd need the $4000 to cover the repairs just in case I decided not to buy the motorcycle. I let them charge my credit card $4000 with the understanding that I would let him know by the end of next weekend whether or not I'm buying the bike. If I buy the bike he'd credit back the $4000 and we'd finance the purchased at 9.5% zero down. If I don't buy the bike he keeps the $4000.
All this being said I'm really not happy about there being no warranty on the bike (although he said for $389 he'd give me a 2 year YES plan). And obviously, I'm not happy that the bike is damaged goods right from the get-go if I purchased it. What I definitely don't want to have happen is me buying the bike for 12-13 something thousand and possibly having regrets at a later time(i.e., some unseen damage or extensive repairs at a later date). At the same time walking away from this and having to pay $4000 for a test ride from hell sure is hard to swallow.
FUN!
Thanks,
David
Thank you Dave, though everybody is trying to help me out and offer advice, quite a few in the last few pages seem to have not read all of my posts pointing out the facts as I 've been able to determine them. Especially, in regard to where I stand legally on this (talked to 3 lawyers) and there all basically said the same thing to me.I am absolutely dumbfounded at the number of people who've spouted off in this thread, CLEARLY without reading what's already been said, and claiming to know the (WRONG) answer to questions that have already been answered. As they say, better to remain silent and have people think you a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.
TW, you sound to me like you're old enough to make your own decisions, and it sounds like you're doing a good job of listening to what people are saying, and sifting out the pearls from the poop. Keep doing just that. I hope you reach an equitable resolution to this.
Hi v65, sorry I didn't get to your question sooner,I'll ask again, got pictures? I would like to see the $4000 damage done to this bike in a 5mph getoff. I'm guessing:1) saddlebag
2) Mirror
3) Lower Fairing
4) Peg
5) Possible stator cover
6) Rim
List price on those parts would add up to a tidy sum, but not $4,000. I could install that stuff in an hour, so labor isn't much of an issue. Charging list for these parts would be underhanded IMO.
One more time, got pics or at least a list of parts?
hi BramFrankYou ought to be able to get AT LEAST a 20% discount on the parts - and installation requires less than what's been suggested; My guess is 4 hours, based on the list.
If he won't deal on the parts call Gary Murphy at Murphskits or Mondak and buy the parts for your dealer from them - THAT ought to prove interesting and you won't have to pay sales taxes on the parts either . . . . there's a thread here with body parts pricing from Mondak and from Ronayers for an '06 on the board . . . . use that as a starting point.
Be happy the bags were off.
Having said that . . . main stand? Side stand? You went down hard . . . pay to fix it, but don't buy the bike, the fairing stay is possibly tweaked . . . . besides, you can buy a bike with a factory warranty for less.
Thanks for your support and kind words in your last post.just curious and trying to help here...how many indicated miles when you started the test ride...the fact you test rode the bike means it's a demo if >100 miles
Enter your email address to join: