Knifemaker
Not me
"terrific for two up riding at 55 to 65 mph in a straight line and modest turns"
That points out the two different type of riders there are. Some riders see their time on their bike as a challenge to get from point A to point B as quickly as they can, pushing their bikes to its limits. Here, you need a motorcycle that's "limits" actually exceed your abilities.
Some riders getting to point B isn't really the reason they are on the bike, and taking their time getting there just allows them more time enjoying just being on a motorcycle. Limits aren't pushed, they are actually avoided. Thus the bike does not need to exceed at anything other than being reasonably comfortable, and safe for this purpose.
Granted their are those that routinely go with a combination of these two, and that's why they just don't make cruisers and track ready sport bikes.
The OP here is attempting to compare apples to oranges, asking why do we need apples when oranges are so much healthier. Why do people buy huge SUV's? Shouldn't we all drive great handling sports cars?
And I know several people that do own Harley's. The idea that they are unreliable machines with lousy brakes, bad suspension, and no ability to take a corner is from what I can actually see a falsehood, an Urban Myth, and basically a lie.
I rode my Brother in laws Dynoglide...and found none of the horrid claims many perpetrate to be true. Bike sounded great, felt solid through a fast sweeper, and the brakes seemed fine. And yes, the bike looked cool.
Yes, not my cup of tea, but again I can see why many would like it.
That points out the two different type of riders there are. Some riders see their time on their bike as a challenge to get from point A to point B as quickly as they can, pushing their bikes to its limits. Here, you need a motorcycle that's "limits" actually exceed your abilities.
Some riders getting to point B isn't really the reason they are on the bike, and taking their time getting there just allows them more time enjoying just being on a motorcycle. Limits aren't pushed, they are actually avoided. Thus the bike does not need to exceed at anything other than being reasonably comfortable, and safe for this purpose.
Granted their are those that routinely go with a combination of these two, and that's why they just don't make cruisers and track ready sport bikes.
The OP here is attempting to compare apples to oranges, asking why do we need apples when oranges are so much healthier. Why do people buy huge SUV's? Shouldn't we all drive great handling sports cars?
And I know several people that do own Harley's. The idea that they are unreliable machines with lousy brakes, bad suspension, and no ability to take a corner is from what I can actually see a falsehood, an Urban Myth, and basically a lie.
I rode my Brother in laws Dynoglide...and found none of the horrid claims many perpetrate to be true. Bike sounded great, felt solid through a fast sweeper, and the brakes seemed fine. And yes, the bike looked cool.
Yes, not my cup of tea, but again I can see why many would like it.
Last edited by a moderator: