bramfrank
BramFrank
So, this brings me to the latest issue with the Zumo - alluded to in the above post;
Because the road detail is so limited, the only way to see local road detail more than a few miles away on a Zumo 660 with version 2.80 firware and 2010 maps is to use the 'browse map'.
The browse map is accessed by tapping the screen anywhere on the map except for where the vehicle is depicted. This will bring up map that allows you to browse and such. By touching and sliding your finger you can drag the map around.
This feature is NOT available when safe mode is disabled and the unit is in the bike mount and the bike is in motion. It DOES work when in the automotive mount and the car is in motion. A real inconsistency.
Given the lack of road detail, we need browse mode (actually, having the detail would be preferable IMHO). Ideally both road detail AND browse mode, but who is being greedy?
One thing mentioned by one of the posters on the Zumoforums site was that my report here highlights only the negative aspects of the Zumo 660.
To be honest, I expect that everyone here KNOWS what a navigator is supposed to do. If someone really feels it important, I certainly can write up a 'what it does well' document. But the reality is that if I am not complaining about something, it can be assumed that the device does whatever it is well (or that I haven't gotten around to testing it).
Let me know.
Because the road detail is so limited, the only way to see local road detail more than a few miles away on a Zumo 660 with version 2.80 firware and 2010 maps is to use the 'browse map'.
The browse map is accessed by tapping the screen anywhere on the map except for where the vehicle is depicted. This will bring up map that allows you to browse and such. By touching and sliding your finger you can drag the map around.
This feature is NOT available when safe mode is disabled and the unit is in the bike mount and the bike is in motion. It DOES work when in the automotive mount and the car is in motion. A real inconsistency.
Given the lack of road detail, we need browse mode (actually, having the detail would be preferable IMHO). Ideally both road detail AND browse mode, but who is being greedy?
One thing mentioned by one of the posters on the Zumoforums site was that my report here highlights only the negative aspects of the Zumo 660.
To be honest, I expect that everyone here KNOWS what a navigator is supposed to do. If someone really feels it important, I certainly can write up a 'what it does well' document. But the reality is that if I am not complaining about something, it can be assumed that the device does whatever it is well (or that I haven't gotten around to testing it).
Let me know.
Last edited by a moderator: