Rear shock linkage maintenance

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Sounds like a deal to me
fans.gif


 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is to show what happens when you don't do the maintenance.
The background on my rear suspension: I installed a Penske 8987 shock on the bike at 5800 miles on 1/10/08. I have done no service to it until 12/29/12. The bike currently has 33,670 miles on it. When I bought the shock from GP Suspension they recommended servicing it every 20,000 miles. I noticed that it was not performing as well as it should about 5000 miles ago.

In December 2012 I had the shock serviced by the new owner of GP suspension (KFG Racing in Auburn, WA). The shock had 27,870 miles on it.

I got a call from GP to come take a look at the shock. Here are pictures of the shim stacks. They show lots of corrosion in the shims. The shims are varying thicknesses and diameters of stainless steel. (EDIT - the yellow color of the shims is due to lighting - they are stainless steel)

photo3_zps0c996538.jpg


Lowspeedshims_zpsa39f4f10.jpg


Below is the assembly that goes inside the remote resevior. It needs to be rebuilt do to the corrosion. This caused additional expesne that could have been avoided with a more regular service schedule

photo3-1_zpsbce736e9.jpg


I'll add more photo of the shock internals when I get them from GP Suspension. I can say they looked pretty bad.
I am not sure who make the washer components for this shock but a good quality stainless steel should not corrode. I rather think there is another issue going on here. To me it looks like a galvanic reaction is what is causing the corosion on the interior parts of the shock. If the stainless steel washers are being push up against and aluminum housing while also being surrounded by shock fluid you may get this reaction. I wonder if grounding the shock housing to the frame would reduce this affect?

But then again I could be totaly delusional.
weirdsmiley.gif


 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is to show what happens when you don't do the maintenance.
The background on my rear suspension: I installed a Penske 8987 shock on the bike at 5800 miles on 1/10/08. I have done no service to it until 12/29/12. The bike currently has 33,670 miles on it. When I bought the shock from GP Suspension they recommended servicing it every 20,000 miles. I noticed that it was not performing as well as it should about 5000 miles ago.

In December 2012 I had the shock serviced by the new owner of GP suspension (KFG Racing in Auburn, WA). The shock had 27,870 miles on it.

I got a call from GP to come take a look at the shock. Here are pictures of the shim stacks. They show lots of corrosion in the shims. The shims are varying thicknesses and diameters of stainless steel. (EDIT - the yellow color of the shims is due to lighting - they are stainless steel)

photo3_zps0c996538.jpg


Lowspeedshims_zpsa39f4f10.jpg


Below is the assembly that goes inside the remote resevior. It needs to be rebuilt do to the corrosion. This caused additional expesne that could have been avoided with a more regular service schedule

photo3-1_zpsbce736e9.jpg


I'll add more photo of the shock internals when I get them from GP Suspension. I can say they looked pretty bad.
I am not sure who make the washer components for this shock but a good quality stainless steel should not corrode. I rather think there is another issue going on here. To me it looks like a galvanic reaction is what is causing the corosion on the interior parts of the shock. If the stainless steel washers are being push up against and aluminum housing while also being surrounded by shock fluid you may get this reaction. I wonder if grounding the shock housing to the frame would reduce this affect?

But then again I could be totaly delusional.
weirdsmiley.gif
I have a very limited knowledge if how these things work. But here is how I understand it in very simplistic terms. The piece being held is a plunger that goes inside the remote resevoir. You can see the holes behind the shims, as load increase and the plunger moves, reisitnace to that movement is controlled by the holes in the vavle body and the shim stack. That controls how fast the plunger moves which controls how fast the swing arm moves to absorb or rebound from the movement.

I think you may be on to something there with the corrosion. If I were to guess what the cause for he pitting, I think the moisture that gets inside might be causing the oil to breakdown along with teh heat cycles over time, which changes the pH and also creates particles floating around in the oil. The particles plate out on the shims and the pH provides the corrosive effect. That's my guess. I also think the grade of stainless is chosen for their flexibility charateristics not their corrosion resistance.

Anyway that is my guess. I am sure there are many out there with better knowledge than me on the subject.

 
You guys are getting way to anal.. Buy a 12 pack and sit back fer a spell.

Let Rossi and company worry about that ****. It's a near 600 pound pig fer shitsakes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You guys are getting way to anal.. Buy a 12 pack and sit back fer a spell.Let Rossi and company worry about that ****. It's a near 600 pound pig fer shitsakes.
Isn't it a long cold winter. Got nothing better to do, well I got to finish lubing the rest of the dirt bikes in my garage. Well that is after I get Hudsons Husky 310 out of the garage Saturday.
smile.png
bike.gif


 
You guys are getting way to anal.. Buy a 12 pack and sit back fer a spell.Let Rossi and company worry about that ****. It's a near 600 pound pig fer shitsakes.
Isn't it a long cold winter. Got nothing better to do, well I got to finish lubing the rest of the dirt bikes in my garage. Well that is after I get Hudsons Husky 310 out of the garage Saturday.
smile.png
bike.gif
I'll be there...I'll be there...

 
Even with a seized collar the exhaust can be "sprung" enough to remove the bolt. The collar is seized on place on my bike but I've removed and serviced the linkage several times now leaving the collar in place and springing the exhaust.

https://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu4/fudgejerkin1188/fjrphotosrebuild023.jpg
My only concern with that (I guess I'm just being anal)! is the design. My guess is that the collar is designed to slide to provide a 'clamping' force on the bearing sleeve without putting any 'side load' on the main bracket (frame). So each time I do it I feel compelled to free off the collar, try a different lube and re-assemble. At least when I tighten it I know that the bearing sleeve is being clamped as designed and I have not distorted the bracket.

Well........... that's my excuse YMMV

 
Donal,

I agree but my fear of snapping the lug off the frame is greater than my desire to free off the collar. I may build up the courage to do it one of these days.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
to remove the collar, use a bolt, washers, nut, and a socket big enough so the collar will fit inside it. arange it all so when you tighten the nut you push the collar into the socket. If you set this up on just the one braket that has the collar you will press it out without putting stress on the brkt itself.

 
And yes I was mistaken about cutting the bolt and doing it without R&R center stand. Its been a while, but maybe it was with the centerstand off and it made it easier to get out with the exhaust on.

 
You guys are getting way to anal.. Buy a 12 pack and sit back fer a spell.Let Rossi and company worry about that ****. It's a near 600 pound pig fer shitsakes.
Isn't it a long cold winter. Got nothing better to do, well I got to finish lubing the rest of the dirt bikes in my garage. Well that is after I get Hudsons Husky 310 out of the garage Saturday.
smile.png
bike.gif
I'll be there...I'll be there...
I know. No hurry, it's not like I got time to work on the others anyway...

 
Off topic a bit but, now that the wing is up an running this is the next project.

Not an actual pic of mine, mines in even better shape.
7905.jpg


$80.00 Garage sale pick. Pretty much in baskets and boxes but %100 complete. Runs like new, but I suspect to PO was a relative as it only shows 2137 miles. No rust on spokes or rims, small tear in seat cover..

Thinking of a complete resto, with paint, seat cover, and a few minor items, but wonder if I'd cash out higher if left alone..

Does anyone else think japan is missing to boat by not doing a retro of these old mini bikes? Way more fun than the scooters they are selling currently.

 
I was just out in the garage trying to remember how I suspended the bike the last time that I did the relay arm and I remembered that I also removed the swingarm and ran a metal rod through the frame where the swingarm bolt goes. I then used to supports on each end of the rod. I have no want to remove the swingarm this time around so I need to firgure out another (safe) to suppport the rear of the bike.

Canadian FJR

 
Even with a seized collar the exhaust can be "sprung" enough to remove the bolt. The collar is seized on place on my bike but I've removed and serviced the linkage several times now leaving the collar in place and springing the exhaust.

https://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu4/fudgejerkin1188/fjrphotosrebuild023.jpg
My only concern with that (I guess I'm just being anal)! is the design. My guess is that the collar is designed to slide to provide a 'clamping' force on the bearing sleeve without putting any 'side load' on the main bracket (frame). So each time I do it I feel compelled to free off the collar, try a different lube and re-assemble. At least when I tighten it I know that the bearing sleeve is being clamped as designed and I have not distorted the bracket.

Well........... that's my excuse YMMV
That is what I believe the design intent of that joint is. The collar is sized to slide in the frame bore enough to provide axial clamping to the relay arm bearing sleeve and thus fix the sleeve to the bikes frame. This clever arrangement prevents side loading the frame tabs while providing solid mounting in the direction of the applied force. I think Fred said this already. This method is also employed where the top shock mounts to the frame.

I also take out that sleeve collar and give it a good cleaning when I do relay arm service.

 

Latest posts

Top